Search found 11 matches
- Fri Sep 07, 2018 4:10 pm
- Forum: General Discussions
- Topic: GProxy for ghostgraz, updated for Warcraft 1.29+
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3487
Re: GProxy for ghostgraz, updated for Warcraft 1.29+
Unitil helped me debug this, I had not expected the PTR server-address to be war3-PTR.classic.blizzard.com. Setting "server = war3-PTR.classic.blizzard.com" in gproxy.cfg makes it work with 1.30.1 (PTR).
- Fri Aug 31, 2018 8:47 pm
- Forum: General Discussions
- Topic: GProxy for ghostgraz, updated for Warcraft 1.29+
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3487
Re: GProxy for ghostgraz, updated for Warcraft 1.29+
@vector Did this break again with 1.30.1 (PTR)? BNCSUtil fails again with logon failed - bncsutil key hash failed (check your Warcraft 3 path and cd keys), disconnecting This is with the 18th august BNCSUtil.dll from current GH release, 10th august one fails with file-error. This is generally why it...
- Sun Aug 19, 2018 10:08 pm
- Forum: General Discussions
- Topic: GProxy for ghostgraz, updated for Warcraft 1.29+
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3487
Re: GProxy for ghostgraz, updated for Warcraft 1.29+
Ahh, was expecting a version-bump to reflect the change. Surely it warrants 2.3.5? Can confirm it works without crashing now.
- Sat Aug 18, 2018 7:45 am
- Forum: General Discussions
- Topic: GProxy for ghostgraz, updated for Warcraft 1.29+
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3487
Re: GProxy for ghostgraz, updated for Warcraft 1.29+
Is it pushed to the repo? Latest commit was august 15th.
- Fri Aug 17, 2018 7:39 pm
- Forum: General Discussions
- Topic: GProxy for ghostgraz, updated for Warcraft 1.29+
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3487
Re: GProxy for ghostgraz, updated for Warcraft 1.29+
Code: Select all
cdkeyroc = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
cdkeytft = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Both are filled out in gproxy.cfg.
- Fri Aug 17, 2018 6:41 pm
- Forum: General Discussions
- Topic: GProxy for ghostgraz, updated for Warcraft 1.29+
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3487
Re: GProxy for ghostgraz, updated for Warcraft 1.29+
Crashes and fails with BNCSUtil. Is BNCSUtil necessary for 1.29+? Unitil's more basic interface (https://github.com/Unitil/gproxyplusplus) still works. Error: [Friday 17-08-2018 20:43:23] [GPROXY] Configuration file successfully loaded [Friday 17-08-2018 20:43:23] [GPROXY] Starting winsock [Friday 1...
- Mon Apr 16, 2018 4:56 pm
- Forum: Processed Support Cases
- Topic: Trying to configure GHost++
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2010
Re: Trying to configure GHost++
How far does your log get? Mine ends at Aura queuing the game, and the bot apparently joins it successfully, but I cannot join it. I can, however, tell the bot to unhost and it will successfully and return to the chat-channel. From the [TCPSOCKET] closed by remote host it looks like BNet is refusing...
- Sun Apr 15, 2018 3:44 pm
- Forum: Processed Support Cases
- Topic: Trying to configure GHost++
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2010
Re: Trying to configure GHost++
From what I found, the bot should not use port 6112. 6112 is used by the client and the realm, and bots create games using other ports. At least that is my current progress with Aura, where I set PvPGN and the client to use 6112 and the bot to use 6121. Haven't gotten it to actually let me join the ...
- Wed Apr 11, 2018 9:01 pm
- Forum: Archive
- Topic: 1.29 Update
- Replies: 106
- Views: 64208
Re: 1.29 Update
I've seen this reported on a couple of custom maps at least, and can replicate it on all versions of Swat Aftermath I have available: When creating a game, Warcraft III throws an error (warning box with red exclamation mark), but the error is empty. No error message in-game nor any error logged. Has...
- Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:32 pm
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: Gingah@USEast
- Replies: 1
- Views: 342
Gingah@USEast
Your Warcraft III username: Gingah
Realm/Gateway: USEast
Why are you banned: Leaving game at the start of a Castle Fight game.
Why you should be unbanned: I did not leave by choice, my router reset and connection dropped when a roommate was trying to fix his net.
Realm/Gateway: USEast
Why are you banned: Leaving game at the start of a Castle Fight game.
Why you should be unbanned: I did not leave by choice, my router reset and connection dropped when a roommate was trying to fix his net.
- Sat Feb 15, 2014 5:12 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [BS]lowtech88
- Replies: 2
- Views: 424
[BS]lowtech88
Your Warcraft III username: Gingah Violator's Warcraft III username: lowtech88 Game name or map name: Battleships Pro v1.199a Stats page link: N/A Rule player violated: Flaming, ruining the game, abused votekick early on Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer): From around 20 minutes ...