Search found 103 matches
- Fri Jul 31, 2015 5:31 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] Dota Intensional Feed king.kar@useast.battle.net and vote kick refusal
- Replies: 5
- Views: 499
- Thu Jul 30, 2015 5:48 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] king.kar - ban dodging
- Replies: 6
- Views: 762
Re: [DOTA] king.kar - ban dodging
larz - thanks but this isn't a request for throwing, just the dodging. He needs to be dealt with because he actually admits to dodging DURING his ban duration. I'm not saying he dodged in this game, but he's admitting to doing it in other games because he doesn't care. I noted this for getstomped be...
- Thu Jul 30, 2015 3:07 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] king.kar - ban dodging
- Replies: 6
- Views: 762
[DOTA] king.kar - ban dodging
Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=6226828 Game Name: DotA Your Warcraft III Username: Jerome Violator's Warcraft III Username: King.kar Violated Rule(s): ban dodging Time of Violation (in-game or replay): See below. Any further thoughts: @getstomped You banned this guy recently - ...
- Wed Jul 22, 2015 2:30 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: Owye@west - excessive AFK
- Replies: 1
- Views: 319
Owye@west - excessive AFK
Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=6181678 Game Name: LtD Your Warcraft III Username: jerome@east Violator's Warcraft III Username: owye@west Violated Rule(s): AFk Time of Violation (in-game or replay): last ~4 rounds Any further thoughts: you can see that on level 14 he has 1500 g...
- Sat Jul 18, 2015 6:25 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] Dota - King.Kar@east - ruining/dodging
- Replies: 2
- Views: 355
[DOTA] Dota - King.Kar@east - ruining/dodging
Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/openstats/game/6159720/ Game Name: DotA Your Warcraft III Username: dirtyD Violator's Warcraft III Username: king.kar@east Violated Rule(s): malicious use of skills, possible IP dodge Time of Violation (in-game or replay): All times are replay time: 42:00 uses tos...
- Tue Jul 07, 2015 6:31 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] RuffPuppy@east - throwing
- Replies: 9
- Views: 749
Re: [DOTA] RuffPuppy@east - throwing
I didn't say killstealing = gamethrowing. You said that he got a kill after he said he was done, as if that suggests he was not in fact done and therefore was not in fact throwing the game. I was pointing out that his "kill" was not an effort to win the game, it was a further effort to hur...
- Tue Jul 07, 2015 4:06 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] RuffPuppy@east - throwing
- Replies: 9
- Views: 749
Re: [DOTA] RuffPuppy@east - throwing
Rapier can be a legit upgrade item on plenty of heroes, especially if you're in a hail mary situation. That was not what happened here. Irrelevant that he didn't die after he got the rapier. And who cares if he got a kill? He wasn't trying to win, just KS to hurt the team. You're really stretching h...
- Tue Jul 07, 2015 2:54 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] RuffPuppy@east - throwing
- Replies: 9
- Views: 749
Re: [DOTA] RuffPuppy@east - throwing
Selling legit items on a necro to buy a rapier is absolutely bannable by itself. I've seen it many times on this forum. But that's not all he did. He afked intentionally at the most important part of the game. At 48:03 he does not say "I have to go guys, let's end." He says: (48:03 / Allie...
- Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:07 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] RuffPuppy@east - throwing
- Replies: 9
- Views: 749
Re: [DOTA] RuffPuppy@east - throwing
He does not appear to have places to go. He says he is done because the team is "creeping," sells his items to buy a divine rapier on necro (enough for a ban right there), and then AFKs at fountain while we have a chance to throne (and continues to AFK when we have to defend base). Not a c...
- Mon Jul 06, 2015 11:22 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] RuffPuppy@east - throwing
- Replies: 9
- Views: 749
[DOTA] RuffPuppy@east - throwing
Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/openstats/game/6097788/ Game Name: DotA Your Warcraft III Username: Dantastic Violator's Warcraft III Username: RuffPuppy@useast Violated Rule(s): throwing Time of Violation (in-game or replay): ~53:00 game time Any further thoughts: At around 53:00 game time I no...
- Wed Jul 01, 2015 11:31 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: Delete
- Replies: 7
- Views: 524
Re: [DOTA] wyvern.@usesast - maphack
I have FCD and DRM. Nothing legit in this game.
As for multiple replays, usually not necessary at all. Players can turn MH on/off from game to game, so you could easily hit on a slew of non-MH games. I've got a lot of experience reporting players for MH (as I'm sure you do, though it's different).
As for multiple replays, usually not necessary at all. Players can turn MH on/off from game to game, so you could easily hit on a slew of non-MH games. I've got a lot of experience reporting players for MH (as I'm sure you do, though it's different).
- Wed Jul 01, 2015 10:22 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: Delete
- Replies: 7
- Views: 524
Re: [DOTA] wyvern.@usesast - maphack
You can definitely fake actions that respond to the fog. Lots of people have been banned on ENT despite doing just that. This guy made three moves that are not just unexpected but were in fact unexplainable (absent MH). I do respect your view though. We'll see what admins say. If the proof in this g...
- Wed Jul 01, 2015 12:17 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: Delete
- Replies: 7
- Views: 524
Re: [DOTA] wyvern.@usesast - maphack
Thank you for the comments. Here are my responses: 1) Most players who maphack undertake some effort to hide their cheating, so it's no surprise when a maphacking player also searches a jungle, etc. The replay shows that wyvern. does search a few times, etc., but does not systemically do this on a r...
- Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:52 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: Delete
- Replies: 7
- Views: 524
Delete
I'm withdrawing this request. I took another look at the replay, and I agree with the poster below that the evidence just isn't clear enough. No need to require an admin to waste precious time to reach the same conclusion. Thanks.
- Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:51 pm
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: lonelychicken@useast
- Replies: 1
- Views: 283
lonelychicken@useast
Your Warcraft III username: lonelychicken Realm/Gateway: useast Why are you banned: skill abuse Why you should be unbanned: F-train was correct, I tried to snowball furion and get him killed. However, there are a few major mitigating factors: First, this was at 25 minutes of a 29 minute game, after...