Hello,
I would like to have my accounts stats to be restored please:
acc1: Jap @useast.battle.net
acc2: arrow)intheknee@useast.battle.net
legionmegaone
&
legionmega
Regards
Search found 22 matches
- Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:53 pm
- Forum: Processed Support Cases
- Topic: Deleted stats restoration
- Replies: 1
- Views: 287
- Mon Dec 12, 2016 11:31 pm
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: gluebale@europe I wasnt ghosting
- Replies: 13
- Views: 877
Re: gluebale@europe I wasnt ghosting
Plus there is no way enemy could have known that I have those two towers on the same roll. Also if saying towers, which enemy should have seen, is not ghosting then saying how many heals your team has left is not ghosting as well?..
- Sun Dec 11, 2016 2:48 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [LTD] [gluebale@europe.battle.net]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 187
[LTD] [gluebale@europe.battle.net]
Replay Link : http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/view_replay.php?file=8726697.w3g Game Name : [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #74 Your Warcraft III Username : coinflip Violator's Warcraft III Username : gluebale Violated Rule(s) : ghosting Time of Violation (in-game or replay) : (18:45 / All) gluebale:...
- Sun Dec 11, 2016 1:02 pm
- Forum: Legion TD
- Topic: why 3.41h replaced 3.41e ?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 2869
Re: why 3.41h replaced 3.41e ?
Autoheal, fair send, -rolls command. These are all nice add-ons to the map which I actually like. Can these be put on 3.41e without messing with map foundation(e.g.creeps movement)? Maybe host mega on 3.41h and 1200+ on 3.41e version if the purpose was to reduce ban requests for noobs?
- Sat Dec 10, 2016 1:45 am
- Forum: Legion TD
- Topic: why 3.41h replaced 3.41e ?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 2869
why 3.41h replaced 3.41e ?
Hello peeps,
Haven't been in ent community for a while. I'm a big fan of ltd but this 3.41h is a nono for me. Has ent stopped supporting 3.41e map version?
Haven't been in ent community for a while. I'm a big fan of ltd but this 3.41h is a nono for me. Has ent stopped supporting 3.41e map version?
- Wed Jun 17, 2015 2:35 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [LTD] [h11nox@entconnect]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 240
[LTD] [h11nox@entconnect]
Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=5987587 Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1v1 #58 Your Warcraft III Username: arrow)intheknee Violator's Warcraft III Username: h11nox Violated Rule(s): antistuck in 1v1 Time of Violation (in-game or replay): all lvls Any further thoughts: game #64:...
- Tue Jun 16, 2015 5:06 pm
- Forum: Leave and DC Penalties
- Topic: dc artichoke
- Replies: 2
- Views: 717
- Sun Jun 14, 2015 5:25 pm
- Forum: Leave and DC Penalties
- Topic: dc fanatismo
- Replies: 1
- Views: 653
- Fri Jun 12, 2015 5:52 pm
- Forum: Leave and DC Penalties
- Topic: dc damexican- / reena
- Replies: 1
- Views: 683
- Fri Jun 12, 2015 5:46 pm
- Forum: LIHL Archive
- Topic: why 3 draws are enough to draw 2v2 game?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 778
Re: why 3 draws are enough to draw 2v2 game?
It's np,it is just sad when teammate troll draw and losing team draw too. AND not even playing till the end, leaving right after draw when already spent 1hour+ on 20+lvl game. I Was just sad.
- Fri Jun 12, 2015 2:24 pm
- Forum: LIHL Archive
- Topic: why 3 draws are enough to draw 2v2 game?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 778
Re: why 3 draws are enough to draw 2v2 game?
Losing team aside, 50% of team is needed to draw, it's not a majority. 6 votes out of 8 in 4s doesn't make it a draw or it does? (I think u need 7?)
@art)y
@art)y
- Thu Jun 11, 2015 12:54 pm
- Forum: LIHL Archive
- Topic: why 3 draws are enough to draw 2v2 game?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 778
Re: why 3 draws are enough to draw 2v2 game?
Just stupid
- Thu Jun 11, 2015 11:27 am
- Forum: LIHL Archive
- Topic: why 3 draws are enough to draw 2v2 game?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 778
- Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:09 pm
- Forum: LIHL Archive
- Topic: Can we ban delays already?
- Replies: 35
- Views: 2485
Re: Can we ban delays already?
How about this: "You are not allowed to build/have delays/split(on purpose)[thus towers separated from other towers] on the level you are making a send". Something like that. Should solve the delay problem
- Mon May 25, 2015 4:05 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [LTD] [kvety@europe.battle.net]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 277
[LTD] [kvety@europe.battle.net]
Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=5862230 Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1v1 #7 Your Warcraft III Username: arrow)intheknee Violator's Warcraft III Username: kvety Violated Rule(s): not default mode without announcing Time of Violation (in-game or replay): Any further thoughts: