Search found 40 matches
- Sat Jan 25, 2014 9:54 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] Fouchana - europe.battle.net - Game Ruining
- Replies: 1
- Views: 219
[DOTA] Fouchana - europe.battle.net - Game Ruining
Your Warcraft III username: pantheman Violator's Warcraft III username: Fouchana Game name or map name: [ENT] DotA arem us/ca #91 Stats page link: https://entgaming.net/openstats/game/2848553/ Rule player violated: Game Ruining throwing the game Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer)...
- Mon Jan 06, 2014 7:13 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] stfu_u_suck (useast.battle.net)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 264
[DOTA] stfu_u_suck (useast.battle.net)
Your Warcraft III username: pantheman Violator's Warcraft III username: stfu_u_suck Game name or map name: [ENT] DotA arem us/ca #41 Stats page link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=2706764 Rule player violated: Game Ruining. Player left on our team making it 4v5. He wanted draw or ff. The re...
- Sun Dec 22, 2013 5:37 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] Akimbo (Europe)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 245
[DOTA] Akimbo (Europe)
Your Warcraft III username: PantheMan Violator's Warcraft III username: Akimbo Game name or map name:[ENT] DotA arem us/ca #97 Stats page link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=2589793 Rule player violated: Game ruining. Never helped defend base. Just kept farming lanes and jungle. Time of inc...
- Thu Oct 31, 2013 9:38 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] Sacred_warrior and thedude_ [ban request]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 435
Re: [DOTA] Sacred_warrior and thedude_ [ban request]
Had the same issue with Sacred_Warrior as well as no votekick.
Here is my ban request from 10/31/2013
https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=18897
Here is my ban request from 10/31/2013
https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=18897
- Thu Oct 31, 2013 9:34 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] Multiple ban request - Feeder/Sold items/No votekick
- Replies: 1
- Views: 304
[DOTA] Multiple ban request - Feeder/Sold items/No votekick
Your Warcraft III username: fleetx.z Violator's Warcraft III username: Sacred_Warrior (europe.battle.net), silkon (europe.battle.net), furysweeps (europe.battle.net), domechaos (useast.battle.net), hardearth (useast.battle.net) Game name or map name: [ENT] DotA sdem us/ca #73 Stats page link: http:/...
- Sun Oct 27, 2013 10:13 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] magmar and hyoudouissei - BOTH uswest.battle.net
- Replies: 1
- Views: 183
[DOTA] magmar and hyoudouissei - BOTH uswest.battle.net
Your Warcraft III username: fleetx.z Violator's Warcraft III username: magmar and hyoudouissei Game name or map name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #32 Stats page link: https://entgaming.net/openstats/game/2277771/ Rule player violated: magmar sold items and went afk, but moved around for 10 mins to avoid a...
- Fri Oct 25, 2013 1:41 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] superdroid.jt - useast.battle.net
- Replies: 1
- Views: 262
[DOTA] superdroid.jt - useast.battle.net
Your Warcraft III username: itsThrallgood Violator's Warcraft III username: superdroid.jt Game name or map name: [ENT] DotA sdem us/ca #21 Stats page link: https://entgaming.net/openstats/game/2261827/ Rule player violated: He went AFK around 5 mins into the game and moved around to stop afk kick Ti...
- Fri Sep 27, 2013 12:40 am
- Forum: Suggestion Archive
- Topic: Dota Rules changes
- Replies: 30
- Views: 1841
Re: Dota Rules changes
Game ruining can be any action you maliciously take that intentionally makes your team lose.
I like this line. That should be on rules. At least it's more detailed than what they have now.
- Thu Sep 26, 2013 3:03 pm
- Forum: Suggestion Archive
- Topic: Dota Rules changes
- Replies: 30
- Views: 1841
Re: Dota Rules changes
I do not appreciate being called a troll. I was told by Yondy take make a suggestion because we talked about certain gane ruining situations. You don't have to be a jerk about it.
- Thu Sep 26, 2013 2:49 pm
- Forum: Suggestion Archive
- Topic: Dota Rules changes
- Replies: 30
- Views: 1841
Re: Dota Rules changes
Please dont use this thread to harass me. This is a suggestion forum. I made a suggestion for more detailed dota rules. please respect that. Youre setting a poor example to ENT community on mod behavior toward everyday players that might have a suggestion.
- Thu Sep 26, 2013 2:30 pm
- Forum: Suggestion Archive
- Topic: Dota Rules changes
- Replies: 30
- Views: 1841
Re: Dota Rules changes
Actually no because he made no attempt to attack base or defend base.
Or simply remove "entire game" and go by farmubg with attempt to help attack/defend bases.
Or simply remove "entire game" and go by farmubg with attempt to help attack/defend bases.
- Thu Sep 26, 2013 4:48 am
- Forum: General Discussions
- Topic: Names ranks for post
- Replies: 2
- Views: 281
Names ranks for post
Who comes up with names for the rank when you post a certain number?
Aren't they BOSS.
Aren't they BOSS.
- Thu Sep 26, 2013 4:33 am
- Forum: Processed Cases
- Topic: Need an admins opinion other than Yondaime
- Replies: 34
- Views: 2938
Re: Need an admins opinion other than Yondaime
Like I said in previous post. I feel I was banned unfairly, but that is not why I made this thread. If this is deemed bannable for game ruining(which it has pretty much already, I'm still banned) it would be nice to have that listed on game rules. So future players know. Because on Tuesday I go to p...
- Thu Sep 26, 2013 3:59 am
- Forum: Suggestion Archive
- Topic: Dota Rules changes
- Replies: 30
- Views: 1841
Re: Dota Rules changes
I would agree. So..."farming/jungling nuetrals for entire game with no attempt to defend base or attack opposing base." See specific is good. Detailed rules help keep people in line and also help mods when banning. Maybe I'm completely off base but I've played dota a long time, and I don't...
- Thu Sep 26, 2013 3:37 am
- Forum: Suggestion Archive
- Topic: Dota Rules changes
- Replies: 30
- Views: 1841
Re: Dota Rules changes
Understandable. Do you really think the list be be long? Because I feel game ruining offenses are VERY specific. I don't the list would get above 20. Also as I said in 1st post tweaking how some rules are written to make them a little detailed. You also need to realize even if 99.9% don't read they ...