Happy New Years ENT!
Just wanted to say HNY to all my bros! My baby was born in November, and she's doing great! @frank @mael @nabo @nabo. @beerlord @larz and everyone else. Just logged on to say what up to a community to that gave me some serious good times! sup bros!
Search found 62 matches
- Sun Jan 01, 2017 11:10 am
- Forum: Defense of the Ancients
- Topic: wrecktify here HNY
- Replies: 3
- Views: 558
- Mon Nov 07, 2016 6:34 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] malaysiacomando - dota
- Replies: 2
- Views: 443
Re: [DOTA] malaysiacomando - dota
And here's a link (not his first offense):
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=50251&p=206357&hilit=malaysiacommando#p206357
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=50251&p=206357&hilit=malaysiacommando#p206357
- Mon Nov 07, 2016 6:32 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] malaysiacomando - dota
- Replies: 2
- Views: 443
[DOTA] malaysiacomando - dota
Replay Link : https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=8575865 Game Name : DotA Your Warcraft III Username : Wrecktifly Violator's Warcraft III Username : malaysiacomando Violated Rule(s) : votekick abuse, excessive flame, and admin impersonation [not a first offense] Time of Violation (in-game or re...
- Sun Sep 18, 2016 5:31 pm
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: threeincheshard@useast
- Replies: 1
- Views: 226
threeincheshard@useast
Your Warcraft III username : threeincheshard Realm/Gateway : east Why are you banned : game crash Why you should be unbanned : high stay % on main This is a weird thing that's happened to me twice in the last two days. I think I've figured out the issue, but I can't test it until I'm unbanned. Sorr...
- Sun Sep 18, 2016 1:33 am
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: Unban plz
- Replies: 1
- Views: 192
Unban plz
Your Warcraft III username: nooblar@east
Realm/Gateway: east
Why are you banned: [ENT] DotA arem us/ca #83 (warcraft crashed)
Why you should be unbanned: high stay % on main ID
Realm/Gateway: east
Why are you banned: [ENT] DotA arem us/ca #83 (warcraft crashed)
Why you should be unbanned: high stay % on main ID
- Fri Aug 26, 2016 7:06 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] pokiamon@east
- Replies: 5
- Views: 581
Re: [DOTA] pokiamon@east
How did you know what his aliases are? If an admin told you that info, it's against the rules - they are not supposed to share that info with others.
- Mon Jun 06, 2016 3:00 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DotA] Boosting - wrecktify and u_lose_i_win
- Replies: 31
- Views: 3749
Re: [DotA] Boosting - wrecktify and u_lose_i_win
@Mogul why are you being so rude to everyone. I gave you an explanation and told you that it would make sense when the admins looked at the IP information and other proof. You don't believe me, because you don't have access to the same information, or it would be obviously correct to you too. But no...
- Sun Jun 05, 2016 9:25 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DotA] Boosting - wrecktify and u_lose_i_win
- Replies: 31
- Views: 3749
Re: [DotA] Boosting - wrecktify and u_lose_i_win
@mogul yea, I didn't know it was him until he told after. It was funny.
- Sun Jun 05, 2016 9:18 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DotA] Boosting - wrecktify and u_lose_i_win
- Replies: 31
- Views: 3749
Re: [DotA] Boosting - wrecktify and u_lose_i_win
@raedric i hear u, in retrospect it was a stupid idea. but my friend asked an admin for permission beforehand and they said it was fine. At least that's my understanding. It resulted in a net gain of maybe 10 elo though, so we're not talking anything significant here. It won't happen again. And I ca...
- Sun Jun 05, 2016 8:51 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DotA] Boosting - wrecktify and u_lose_i_win
- Replies: 31
- Views: 3749
Re: [DotA] Boosting - wrecktify and u_lose_i_win
There's only throwing in one game you linked, which is not good but it has nothing to do with boosting and was because my friend wanted to get revenge on someone on his team. In the first game you linked, i-blow-pandas was techies and got a bunch of deaths from suicides, but he actually killed me or...
- Sun Jun 05, 2016 1:25 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DotA] Boosting - wrecktify and u_lose_i_win
- Replies: 31
- Views: 3749
Re: [DotA] Boosting - wrecktify and u_lose_i_win
1) I've been playing with this guy for 3 days (hence the few games you linked that I'm in are the only ones I've played with him). Any admin can confirm that I've got about 1% of my games with this person. 2) The reason for the bad stats in prior games is that it's a different person playing the sam...
- Thu May 05, 2016 5:41 am
- Forum: Suggestion Archive
- Topic: Dota Techies Mines
- Replies: 6
- Views: 801
Re: Dota Techies Mines
The rules are on the ENT wiki. You can't be banned for moving a courier and keeping it from dying. It where's it's clear that you were trying to check for mines. If there's no good reason for your courier to be in a particular place (shopping or delivering items, or avoiding its own death), then it'...
- Thu May 05, 2016 1:29 am
- Forum: Suggestion Archive
- Topic: Dota Techies Mines
- Replies: 6
- Views: 801
Re: Dota Techies Mines
The issue here is that a lot of players still haven't learned the rule, and when they are told the rule in game they simply think it's a lie. Yes, eventually people will get banned enough to learn, but why go through all that?
- Wed Apr 27, 2016 1:57 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] whymee dota glitch abuse
- Replies: 6
- Views: 991
[DOTA] whymee dota glitch abuse
Replay Link : http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/view_replay.php?file=7636518.w3g Game Name : dota Your Warcraft III Username : wrecktify Violator's Warcraft III Username : whymee Violated Rule(s) : glitch abuse Time of Violation (in-game or replay) : ~50 minutes Any further thoughts : whymee used...
- Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:40 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] [baratko@uswest.battle.net]
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1093
Re: [DOTA] [baratko@uswest.battle.net]
@getstomped What do you mean you don't want to debate phrasing? You issued me a warning over phrasing. So let's discuss it. When I see "warning" it usually means that someone has violated a rule and next time will get a ban for it. If that's not what you meant, please let me know. Issuing ...