Search found 18 matches
- Fri Jun 02, 2017 8:42 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: mexicat@useast - leaver
- Replies: 2
- Views: 256
Re: mexicat@useast - leaver
Yes, I agree with this request, please ban mexicat.
- Wed May 03, 2017 8:24 pm
- Forum: Custom Games
- Topic: Battleship Crossfire Tournament
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2487
Re: Battleship Crossfire Tournament
Great idea. I would like to participate. Thanks.
- Wed Apr 12, 2017 6:58 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [BS] qaqa@useast.battle.net
- Replies: 2
- Views: 435
Re: [BS] qaqa@useast.battle.net
I upgraded towers, and applied some psych pressure to get the enemy to leave the game, this is nothing more than a ruse on my part to get the enemy team to leave. There were no insults, the one time I used harsh language was quoting a famous movie: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_mDTLphIVY Sorry y...
- Sun Mar 19, 2017 7:52 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [BS] D-M@europe.battle.net
- Replies: 7
- Views: 756
Re: [BS] D-M@europe.battle.net
D-M is not my account. Next time you make accusations you need to have proof.
D-M sounds like someone who doesn't want to play vs stacked team, which makes perfect sense to me.
D-M sounds like someone who doesn't want to play vs stacked team, which makes perfect sense to me.
- Sat Dec 17, 2016 12:16 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [BS] Battleships CF ban req for schredder
- Replies: 8
- Views: 755
Re: [BS] Battleships CF ban req for schredder
1. I claim schredder initiated votekick for personal reasons, maybe he dislikes me, or maybe he dislikes ship upgrade strategy, or maybe something else. My point is that he started votekick for personal reasons, and just so admins are aware, his -votekick was for opponent (I was in his opponent team...
- Wed Dec 14, 2016 10:11 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [BS] Battleships CF ban req for schredder
- Replies: 8
- Views: 755
Re: [BS] Battleships CF ban req for schredder
I certainly hope schredder has data to back up his claim that I "ruin more games than I play", but that's not the point, he makes some wild accusations and that's his opinion. Admins should focus on the game in question, where schredder breaks ENT rules about invalid use of kick or votekic...
- Wed Dec 14, 2016 8:38 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [BS] Battleships CF ban req for schredder
- Replies: 8
- Views: 755
[BS] Battleships CF ban req for schredder
Replay Link http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/view_replay.php?file=8740560.w3g : Game Name BattleShips Crossfire : Your Warcraft III Username qaqa : Violator's Warcraft III Username schredder : Violated Rule(s)started multiple unfair kicks without any reason : Time of Violation (in-game or replay...
- Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:59 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: Battleships Crossfire Ban request. Player is
- Replies: 2
- Views: 156
Battleships Crossfire Ban request. Player is
Replay Link https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=8680654 : Game Name BS Crossfire : Your Warcraft III Username qaqa : Violator's Warcraft III Username p00tieTang : Violated Rule(s) threats of murder and rape to players : This is what he said: (39:17 / All) p00tieTanG: I WILL KILL YOUR FAMILY (39:...
- Tue Nov 08, 2016 9:10 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [BSCF] fogofwar
- Replies: 4
- Views: 507
Re: [BSCF] fogofwar
I confirm what B62 said. I was in 3 of these games with him, and mr fogofwar left all 3 of them within the first 3 minutes. He gave no reason, just quit the map, and immediately joined the next game lobby.
ENT, please make it clear to him this behavior is juvenile, and unacceptable.
Thanks
ENT, please make it clear to him this behavior is juvenile, and unacceptable.
Thanks
- Sun Aug 28, 2016 11:21 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [BS CF] pewpewboaty and legendofthe7ggs@europe.battle.net
- Replies: 3
- Views: 421
[BS CF] pewpewboaty and legendofthe7ggs@europe.battle.net
Replay Link https://entgaming.net/openstats/dota/?u=pewpewboaty and his buddy https://entgaming.net/findreplay.php?player=legendofthe7ggs@europe.battle.net : Game Name BS Crossfire : Your Warcraft III Username qaqa : Violator's Warcraft III Username : pewpewboaty and legendofthe7ggs Violated Rule(s...
- Sun Aug 28, 2016 7:15 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [BSCF]bodomire@europe.battle.net 2nd request
- Replies: 2
- Views: 274
Re: [BSCF]bodomire@europe.battle.net 2nd request
What Aliscad reports is factual, Bodomire continues to leave over 50% of the games he joins. Please ban him. His only interest appears to be ruining games.
- Wed Aug 17, 2016 12:53 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: rickroos@uswest.battle.net
- Replies: 4
- Views: 401
Re: rickroos@uswest.battle.net
I was in that game, and rickross also threatened all players with physical violence, he said he will come and find our families to murder us...
Please ban this trash talking game ruiner.
Please ban this trash talking game ruiner.
- Sat Aug 06, 2016 7:30 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [BS] [troende_sonen@Europe]
- Replies: 7
- Views: 596
Re: [troende_sonen@Europe]
I appreciate your response. However, the URL you provided points to !votekick rules. If we look at the in game chat here: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/view_replay.php?file=8152736.w3g it's clear that no !votekick commands were used in this game. BattleShips Crossfire has its own -kick command...
- Sat Aug 06, 2016 3:48 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [BS] [troende_sonen@Europe]
- Replies: 7
- Views: 596
Re: [troende_sonen@Europe]
While i somewhat agree with you, I think you are interpreting the rules too loosely. If ENT wants to introduce a rule like this, they are welcome to, but my opinion is that its best to stick to strict interpretation of the rules.
- Sat Aug 06, 2016 12:50 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [BS] [troende_sonen@Europe]
- Replies: 7
- Views: 596
Re: [troende_sonen@Europe]
I was not in that game, just wanted to point out ENT does not have a rule that says "players are required to kick afk".
I understand it can be frustrating, but, what rule did they break?
I understand it can be frustrating, but, what rule did they break?