Search found 625 matches
- Thu Aug 13, 2015 10:38 pm
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: Evol@USEast
- Replies: 6
- Views: 586
Re: Evol@USEast
You try to put words in my mouth making it seem like I was doing it so we would die when I would have rather taken the (22 I believe) elo. The ban would be fair if it came from an unbais moderator. Not to mention the several times you openly admitted to not liking me in ENT Chat, which further incre...
- Thu Aug 13, 2015 10:28 pm
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: Evol@USEast
- Replies: 6
- Views: 586
Re: Evol@USEast
@Mariah - I never blamed my real life situations for my game ruin, I said it contributed to my stress. Excuse me for not being as patient and saintly as you - same reason I pointed out why you shouldn't process the BRQ I ask that nabo. not contribute either. if @Av1oN would be so kind as to review t...
- Thu Aug 13, 2015 9:28 pm
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: Evol@USEast
- Replies: 6
- Views: 586
Evol@USEast
Your Warcraft III username : Evol Realm/Gateway : USEast Why are you banned : Game Ruin Why you should be unbanned : Life happened and I was very upset that day, on top of awful teams, I got upset and flamed. I gave my reasoning for saving lumber in the Original Post. Please view those reasons ther...
- Thu Aug 13, 2015 7:54 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [LTD] Evol USEast
- Replies: 5
- Views: 783
Re: [LTD] Evol USEast
Tch, after a shitty day filled with shitty games (3v4s and trolls) and terrible teams, I was not about to up king so we could lose at 17/20. The game was lost. Quick recap. Green messed up oracle build - built a half space off meaning he loses 6 total units of oracle buff (3 on each end of the build...
- Thu Aug 13, 2015 6:17 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [LTD] Evol USEast
- Replies: 5
- Views: 783
Re: [LTD] Evol USEast
Refused to play because of leaver on level 2 and 200 leaks within the first two rounds and my cross sold his tower as valuer on level 1. I was not going to play another long dragged out game, where we would get overpowered by numbers, saving my wood and sending lv7 hoping to kill was the plan. There...
- Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:30 am
- Forum: General Discussions
- Topic: Who is new CW mod?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 2392
Re: Who is new CW mod?
Regardless of CW specialty mod or not, I usually comment all the required work on CW cases within a day. All a mod has to do is read over the information @Gaara , so you can usually just wait a day or so and someone from the community would get to it and give all of the necessary information to proc...
- Tue Aug 11, 2015 11:57 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [CW] TheFunDealer@uswest.battle.net
- Replies: 9
- Views: 533
Re: [CW] TheFunDealer@uswest.battle.net
There is no default game mode for Civilization Wars
Invalid request - should be denied.
Invalid request - should be denied.
- Sat Aug 08, 2015 9:39 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [CW] SvenBad@euro, mozen@euro
- Replies: 2
- Views: 426
Re: [CW] SvenBad@euro, mozen@euro
Bump ------- 1:50 SvenBad builds mid in retaliation to i_kill_satan's misclicks Chat Log ----------- 2:38 [All] SvenBad: A votekick against player [SvenBad] has been started by player [I_kill_satan]. 4 votes are needed within 60 seconds to pass. 2:47 [All] SvenBad: Player [Maverui] voted to kick pla...
- Sat Aug 08, 2015 9:26 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [CW] rapm1231@asia
- Replies: 2
- Views: 467
Re: [CW] rapm1231@asia
Bump
-------
2:15 First instance of malicious pull
Results in loss of camp and by further extent lane.
-------
2:15 First instance of malicious pull
Results in loss of camp and by further extent lane.
- Sat Aug 08, 2015 9:19 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [CW] [liquidfire@useast]
- Replies: 3
- Views: 454
Re: [CW] [liquidfire@useast]
Bump -------- Chat Log ------------- 25:00 [Allies] LiquidFire: i deto soon 25:31 [Allies] LiquidFire: mid active or detio 25:39 [Allies] LiquidFire: 10 25:40 [Allies] LiquidFire: 9 25:41 [Allies] LiquidFire: 8 25:42 [Allies] LiquidFire: 7 25:43 [Allies] LiquidFire: 6 25:44 [Allies] LiquidFire: 5 25...
- Sat Aug 08, 2015 4:56 am
- Forum: Processed Applications
- Topic: Evol@USEast
- Replies: 3
- Views: 966
Evol@USEast
Name: Josh Age: 19 Game moderator specialty (see below for choices): Island Defense (the basics), DotA/LoD, Civilization Wars, Legion Tower Defense, Battleships (the basics), Castle Fight (the basics) as well as knowing how to play and the general rules for a large number of less played games. Brie...
- Tue Jul 28, 2015 6:05 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [CW] touge + miltiple
- Replies: 2
- Views: 465
Re: [CW] touge + miltiple
Bump ------- Togue deactivates docks and refuses to reopen. 31:45 [Allies] touge: not my problem ^^ 31:53 [Allies] touge: get bunkers 31:56 [Allies] touge: u have industrial 4 mins 31:57 [Allies] touge: no bunker 31:58 [Allies] easystyle: u deact 32:02 [Allies] easystyle: u make problem 32:08 [Allie...
- Sun Jul 19, 2015 1:14 am
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: Evol@uswest - Autoban
- Replies: 1
- Views: 356
Evol@uswest - Autoban
Your Warcraft III username: Evol
Realm/Gateway: uswest
Why are you banned: autobanex
Why you should be unbanned: my computer shutdown (Again). Same thing happened as my last autoban. I'll watch my laptops battery more closely in the future.
Realm/Gateway: uswest
Why are you banned: autobanex
Why you should be unbanned: my computer shutdown (Again). Same thing happened as my last autoban. I'll watch my laptops battery more closely in the future.
- Wed Jul 08, 2015 8:32 pm
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: Evol@uswest - Autoban
- Replies: 1
- Views: 343
Evol@uswest - Autoban
Your Warcraft III username: Evol
Realm/Gateway: @uswest
Why are you banned: autobanex
Why you should be unbanned: My Laptop shutdown, should have a reasonably high stay percentage still.
Realm/Gateway: @uswest
Why are you banned: autobanex
Why you should be unbanned: My Laptop shutdown, should have a reasonably high stay percentage still.
- Thu May 28, 2015 7:43 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [CW] 48.1@asia.battle.net
- Replies: 4
- Views: 511
Re: [CW] 48.1@asia.battle.net
First instance of malicious pulling seems to be at 2:10.