Actually, it's not easy to manage all this. You bring very good arguments about players who ruin voluntarily.
I think that the possibility of generating 3v3 or 4v4 games could solve the problem of lack of players at later times.
Thanks for this discussion.
Search found 14 matches
- Fri Apr 26, 2024 3:22 am
- Forum: Suggestions
- Topic: BAN ? 5v5 best situation ?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4283
- Mon Apr 08, 2024 2:57 am
- Forum: Suggestions
- Topic: BAN ? 5v5 best situation ?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4283
BAN ? 5v5 best situation ?
This is not a suggestion but rather a reflection...
There are too many players banned. It's taking longer and longer to start a game.
What to do to improve the start of games?
Can it have 3v3 games? 4v4? and 5v5?
Any other suggestions? Thoughts on banned players?
There are too many players banned. It's taking longer and longer to start a game.
What to do to improve the start of games?
Can it have 3v3 games? 4v4? and 5v5?
Any other suggestions? Thoughts on banned players?
- Mon Feb 12, 2024 3:07 am
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: ban ruiner griefer just tantrums and feed
- Replies: 7
- Views: 721
Re: ban ruiner griefer just tantrums and feed
typing 100x !ff = toxic player for me
ban 7 days
ban 7 days
- Thu Feb 01, 2024 6:42 am
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: BAN rer333 (ruinner. buy gem for the ennemy)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 864
Re: BAN rer333 (ruinner. buy gem for the ennemy)
International ruin need to be banned few days i think
- Thu Jan 25, 2024 12:11 am
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: BAN rer333 (ruinner. buy gem for the ennemy)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 864
Re: BAN rer333 (ruinner. buy gem for the ennemy)
What happens to players who ruin games Intentionally?
- Tue Jan 23, 2024 3:46 am
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: BAN rer333 (ruinner. buy gem for the ennemy)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 864
BAN rer333 (ruinner. buy gem for the ennemy)
Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/download.php?f=12197899.w3g&fc=12197899.w3g Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #66 Your Warcraft III Username: andek Violator's Warcraft III Username: rer333 Violated Rule(s): Buy gem for enemy 18:42 Time of Violation (in-game or replay): at the end...
- Thu Jul 14, 2016 3:16 am
- Forum: Suggestion Archive
- Topic: Petition Post to bring back the old dota 6.83d [EDIT - I added a poll]
- Replies: 80
- Views: 14093
Re: Petition Post to bring back the old dota 6.83d
StormBorn wrote:Admins, just provide both versions: problem solved!
Simple as that!
I AGREE. I vote for 2 versions [ENT] Dota 6.83d apem us/ca # and [ENT] Dota NEW apem us/ca #
- Tue Jul 12, 2016 8:50 pm
- Forum: Suggestion Archive
- Topic: Petition Post to bring back the old dota 6.83d [EDIT - I added a poll]
- Replies: 80
- Views: 14093
Re: Petition Post to bring back the old dota 6.83d
Agree for a come back to version 6.83d
- Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:46 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] DOTA - BAN UR.DEAD
- Replies: 2
- Views: 356
[DOTA] DOTA - BAN UR.DEAD
Replay Link : https://entgaming.net/replay/view_replay.php?file=1467618073.w3g Game Name : [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #56 Your Warcraft III Username : Kill[A] Violator's Warcraft III Username : UR.DEAD Violated Rule(s) : Refusing cooperating and KS all game Time of Violation (in-game or replay) : He pas...
- Sat Jun 04, 2016 6:22 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] adkporTnsfee ruined game ... but we win
- Replies: 3
- Views: 283
Re: [DOTA] adkporTnsfee ruined game ... but we win
after feeding alot, he start warding our neutral creep at 15 min ... ban for long time please.
- Fri Jun 03, 2016 3:51 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] adkporTnsfee ruined game ... but we win
- Replies: 3
- Views: 283
[DOTA] adkporTnsfee ruined game ... but we win
Replay Link : https://entgaming.net/replay/view_replay.php?file=1464925715.w3g Game Name : [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #68 Your Warcraft III Username : Kill[A] Violator's Warcraft III Username : adkporTnsfee Violated Rule(s) : Refuse cooperating ... using ward on our wood, conclusion no more spam neutral...
- Fri Jun 03, 2016 3:49 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] Do you think OlGreg MH ?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 910
- Wed Jun 01, 2016 6:46 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] Do you think OlGreg MH ?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 910
Re: [DOTA] Do you think OlGreg MH ?
I understand , I thought you have programs to see which players use software to maphack
- Wed Jun 01, 2016 6:53 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] Do you think OlGreg MH ?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 910
[DOTA] Do you think OlGreg MH ?
Replay Link : https://entgaming.net/replay/view_replay.php?file=1464763883.w3g Game Name : [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #96 Your Warcraft III Username : Kill[A] Violator's Warcraft III Username : OlGreg Violated Rule(s) : Map Hack Time of Violation (in-game or replay) : alot of sign Any further thoughts :...