Search found 14 matches
- Fri Sep 16, 2016 12:06 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: clownslayer- flaming, hard every game
- Replies: 2
- Views: 282
clownslayer- flaming, hard every game
Replay Link : https://entgaming.net/openstats/game/8348067/ Game Name : https://entgaming.net/openstats/game/8348067/ Your Warcraft III Username : Condition Violator's Warcraft III Username : clownslayer- Violated Rule(s) : Flaming hard, and he has a long history of flaming on ent. Just look throug...
- Fri Sep 16, 2016 12:02 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: darksiele, laz3rpanda, kasandraklich
- Replies: 2
- Views: 343
Re: darksiele, laz3rpanda, kasandraklich
Actually, he went griefing while base was getting raped. Which is banable, i guess kids like you don't care about rules or even about reading them.
It's no wonder though, i expected you to comment and make absolutely 0 sense.
Good day.
It's no wonder though, i expected you to comment and make absolutely 0 sense.
Good day.
- Fri Sep 16, 2016 11:16 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: darksiele, laz3rpanda, kasandraklich
- Replies: 2
- Views: 343
darksiele, laz3rpanda, kasandraklich
Replay Link : https://entgaming.net/openstats/game/8347947/ Game Name : https://entgaming.net/openstats/game/8347947/ Your Warcraft III Username : Condition Violator's Warcraft III Username : darksiele, laz3rpanda, kasandraklich Violated Rule(s) : Didn't votekick afk, and griefing. Time of Violatio...
- Thu Aug 18, 2016 5:54 am
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: Banned first time - For excessive time..
- Replies: 8
- Views: 532
Re: Banned first time - For excessive time..
@Opened Please read all requests relating to failure to heal, standard being 2d as beginning. AFK is 5 days. Refusal to vk game ruiner/vk abuse is at minimum 3 days. So yes; I am being very real. Do what Arii asked please. Afk is 2 days, just by looking at the current appeals, people got 2 days, an...
- Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:53 pm
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: Banned first time - For excessive time..
- Replies: 8
- Views: 532
Re: Banned first time - For excessive time..
@Y0SHI
That' is a lie right there.
I guess you should be banned 2 days now..
Ent has never banned someone 2 days for they're first offence.
Get real...
That' is a lie right there.
I guess you should be banned 2 days now..
Ent has never banned someone 2 days for they're first offence.
Get real...
- Wed Aug 17, 2016 6:40 am
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: Banned first time - For excessive time..
- Replies: 8
- Views: 532
Re: Banned first time - For excessive time..
@BeerLord
Mispelling, please delete post 2, since i can't for some reason.
Mispelling, please delete post 2, since i can't for some reason.
- Wed Aug 17, 2016 6:40 am
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: Banned first time - For excessive time..
- Replies: 8
- Views: 532
Re: Banned first time - For excessive time..
Care to explain why you banned me 2 days @beerlor ?
- Wed Aug 17, 2016 6:38 am
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: Banned first time - For excessive time..
- Replies: 8
- Views: 532
Banned first time - For excessive time..
Your Warcraft III username : 0pen Realm/Gateway : Europe Why are you banned : I said i was an admin. Apparently someone reported that. Why you should be unbanned : 2 days for a first offence is rather excessive.. While i do understand ENT has rules in which users must obey, i also think you should ...
- Wed Aug 10, 2016 10:45 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: smart_ruba
- Replies: 2
- Views: 163
smart_ruba
Replay Link : https://entgaming.net/openstats/game/8180939/ Game Name : Who cares.. Your Warcraft III Username : 0pen Violator's Warcraft III Username : smart_ruba guess theres more. Violated Rule(s) : Using currier on mines. Time of Violation (in-game or replay) : Since start of the game. mostly i...
- Wed Aug 10, 2016 8:25 am
- Forum: Suggestion Archive
- Topic: Ban requests
- Replies: 1
- Views: 225
Ban requests
Hi, I currently see no reason to even post these ban request's, why? Simple, the ones posted not about mh, is the ones taken first. You have quite a few from over 4 days ago, which could have been resolved easily, if you took the time. However, taking the ones that just been posted first, just seems...
- Tue Aug 09, 2016 11:36 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [CF] karatestefan@europe.battle.net
- Replies: 2
- Views: 254
Re: [CF] karatestefan@europe.battle.net
1 year ban? For that? Joke..
A max of 12 hours or something, 1 year LOL.
And calling him autistic is breaking the forum rules, guess that's 1 year for you too!
A max of 12 hours or something, 1 year LOL.
And calling him autistic is breaking the forum rules, guess that's 1 year for you too!
- Tue Aug 09, 2016 11:25 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] [LOD] [jiminy_cricket@server.eurobattle.net]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 726
Re: [DOTA] [LOD] [jiminy_cricket@server.eurobattle.net]
I don't see why you should care. He's on your enemy's team. As far as i see it, you just sad because you lost to him.
Besides that, i guess ignore is there for a specific reason.
Besides that, i guess ignore is there for a specific reason.
- Tue Aug 09, 2016 11:23 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] spikes620 uswest maphacking in dota
- Replies: 5
- Views: 734
Re: [DOTA] spikes620 uswest maphacking in dota
The way you stated that in the game, sure does sound like you knew he fog-clicked him inside the game.
- Tue Aug 09, 2016 11:22 am
- Forum: Introduce Yourself
- Topic: Hi all
- Replies: 3
- Views: 638
Hi all
I'm 0pen on battle.net, i decided to drop by, I'm a returning DotA player, never played on ent though, but i have now for a few games, and i did enjoy the level. Just wanted to say hi.-