Search found 80 matches
- Thu Nov 29, 2018 2:41 am
- Forum: Suggestion Archive
- Topic: People should not be allowed to threaten bans
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1369
Re: People should not be allowed to threaten bans
Observe in a replay or chat log
- Thu Nov 29, 2018 2:35 am
- Forum: Suggestion Archive
- Topic: People should not be allowed to threaten bans
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1369
Re: People should not be allowed to threaten bans
No, it's about 1 and 2. That's why I posted both. Regardless of who posted the BRQ, MoMo- threatened to ban people, and by not banning him for it, he is being allowed to threaten bans even though he is not an admin.
- Thu Nov 29, 2018 2:24 am
- Forum: Suggestion Archive
- Topic: People should not be allowed to threaten bans
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1369
Re: People should not be allowed to threaten bans
I posted the brq already, so anyone can see "what's cooking". I just hope you won't keep pretending to be an admin because BeerLord is your friend. Just because you are buddy buddy with the admins doesn't mean you can threaten to ban people and talk to them like any way you like.
- Thu Nov 29, 2018 2:00 am
- Forum: Suggestion Archive
- Topic: People should not be allowed to threaten bans
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1369
People should not be allowed to threaten bans
Apparently, according to this brq: https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=138125 We are allowed to say things like: (02:10 / All) MoMo-: ima ban his ass (04:32 / All) MoMo-: whoever (04:33 / All) MoMo-: doesnt kick (04:34 / All) MoMo-: will be ban 1) I suggest that isn't allowed. 2) If...
- Thu Nov 29, 2018 1:37 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] MoMo-@entconnect
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1176
Re: [DOTA] MoMo-@entconnect
Stop replying, every comment you post has another asinine assumption of yours.
- Thu Nov 29, 2018 1:32 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] MoMo-@entconnect
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1176
Re: [DOTA] MoMo-@entconnect
Where is the proof that I was banned by MoMo? There goes your "revenge" argument. Regarding me reviewing his games, I will give you a clue, since you are not only ignorant, but also arrogant: He recently posted a ban request for this same game. I haven't seen anyone say "I'll ban you&...
- Thu Nov 29, 2018 1:21 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] MoMo-@entconnect
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1176
Re: [DOTA] MoMo-@entconnect
ASSuMe more buddy. You don't have a clue.
Proof?
Proof?
- Thu Nov 29, 2018 1:16 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] MoMo-@entconnect
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1176
Re: [DOTA] MoMo-@entconnect
Assume less about my intentions, and please stop replying to every comment as if anyone cares what your opinion is.
Who says making a request that anyone else reviews means it's up to me?
You have entirely too much time on your hands. Loser.
Who says making a request that anyone else reviews means it's up to me?
You have entirely too much time on your hands. Loser.
- Thu Nov 29, 2018 1:08 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] MoMo-@entconnect
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1176
[DOTA] MoMo-@entconnect
Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/view_replay.php?file=11594955.w3g Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #79 Your Warcraft III Username: NOT IN THE GAME Violator's Warcraft III Username: MoMo- Violated Rule(s): impersonating ent staff Time of Violation (in-game or replay): (02:10 / All) M...
- Mon Nov 26, 2018 3:25 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] MoMo-@entconnect
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1826
Re: [DOTA] MoMo-@entconnect
Funny how you did not say anything about your in-game comments making yourself appear to be an admin.
- Mon Nov 26, 2018 3:15 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] MoMo-@entconnect
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1826
[DOTA] MoMo-@entconnect
Replay Link : http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/view_replay.php?file=11594955.w3g Game Name : [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #79 Your Warcraft III Username : Violator's Warcraft III Username : MoMo- Violated Rule(s) : impersonating ent staff Time of Violation (in-game or replay) : (02:10 / All) MoMo-: ima...
- Thu Nov 22, 2018 5:31 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [dota] suckers
- Replies: 2
- Views: 560
Re: [dota] suckers
How is using a hero's ability a glitch? I could not find anywhere in the rules where it says to limit the use of Roof's ult with aghnaims (please provide me a link if I am wrong). If you look at dota 2, they say, "There is no limit on how many enchanted trees can be up at one time." and &q...
- Sun Nov 18, 2018 2:17 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] blueoranges and mage.age vk abuse
- Replies: 1
- Views: 611
[DOTA] blueoranges and mage.age vk abuse
Replay Link : http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/view_replay.php?file=11583258.w3g Game Name : [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #74 Your Warcraft III Username : waphyem Violator's Warcraft III Username : blueoranges and mage.age Violated Rule(s) : vk abuse Time of Violation (in-game or replay) : (19:31 / All...
- Sat Nov 03, 2018 12:41 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] flawlessvictory@entconnect
- Replies: 1
- Views: 366
[DOTA] flawlessvictory@entconnect
Replay Link : http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/view_replay.php?file=11556773.w3g Game Name : [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #0 Your Warcraft III Username : plucked Violator's Warcraft III Username : flawlessvictory Violated Rule(s) : vk abuse Time of Violation (in-game or replay) : (26:14 / Allied) Flawl...
- Tue Oct 16, 2018 5:29 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] qqaapp@uswest refuse to defend
- Replies: 1
- Views: 401
[DOTA] qqaapp@uswest refuse to defend
Replay Link : https://entgaming.net/openstats/dota/game/11498303/ Game Name : [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #13 Your Warcraft III Username : zzaqrds Violator's Warcraft III Username : qqaapp Violated Rule(s) : refused to defend Time of Violation (in-game or replay) : Right around here: (44:40 / Allied) zza...