Search found 17 matches
- Sat Feb 09, 2019 1:47 am
- Forum: Defense of the Ancients
- Topic: AREM Revival
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2194
Re: AREM Revival
We ended up getting 4 AREM games going today Sylvanas, we had to message APEM lobbys to join the arem lobby, but after the first game got going, the next 3 filled pretty quick with repeat players and then lobbys fill in general pretty easily when it has 6-7 already. I think a specific day of the wee...
- Fri Feb 08, 2019 9:21 pm
- Forum: Defense of the Ancients
- Topic: AREM Revival
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2194
Re: AREM Revival
We just had 4 games in a row after this post... We had a small group willing to wait in the lobbys and we spread the word the the APEM lobbys, our journey will be to continue to spread the word and sit in AREM games, please join us. Also, AR has luck involved, but the luck involved in the mode isn't...
- Fri Feb 08, 2019 6:51 pm
- Forum: Defense of the Ancients
- Topic: AREM Revival
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2194
AREM Revival
The current state of dota on the ENT bots after it switched from bnet to entconnect only has been 99% APEM games, and I haven't seen a single AREM game run in last few weeks. I know there are people who still prefer arem, as we end up changing APEM games to arem sometimes, with 5+ people voting for ...
- Wed Feb 06, 2019 6:30 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] Ban Request for "Badabing" for game ruining.
- Replies: 5
- Views: 959
Re: [DOTA] Ban Request for "Badabing" for game ruining.
Its been a week, are you guys going to handle this? I understand you guys can be busy, especially with real life stuff, but have never seen a ban request last a week before without being addressed.
- Thu Jan 31, 2019 6:19 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] Ban Request for Amodeo for multiple things.
- Replies: 4
- Views: 676
Re: [DOTA] amodeo@entconnect
I posted a more detailed version of this same ban.
- Thu Jan 31, 2019 6:18 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] Ban Request for Amodeo for multiple things.
- Replies: 4
- Views: 676
[DOTA] Ban Request for Amodeo for multiple things.
Replay Link : https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11663257 Game Name : [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #15 Your Warcraft III Username : FooK (Frenzuh is my AKA and name on forums) Violator's Warcraft III Username : Amodeo Violated Rule(s) : Game ruin / trolling / uncooperative team play[list=][/list] Time...
- Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:32 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] Ban Request for "Badabing" for game ruining.
- Replies: 5
- Views: 959
[DOTA] Ban Request for "Badabing" for game ruining.
Replay Link : https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11662589 Game Name : [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #76 Your Warcraft III Username : FooK (Frenzuh is aka and name on Forums) Violator's Warcraft III Username : BadaBing Violated Rule(s) : Game Ruining Time of Violation (in-game or replay) : 25:45 Any fur...
- Mon Jan 28, 2019 6:11 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] VK abuse for Mylene.Farmer and your_stepfather
- Replies: 2
- Views: 438
[DOTA] VK abuse for Mylene.Farmer and your_stepfather
Replay Link : https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11661145 Game Name : [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #43 Your Warcraft III Username : FooK (Frenzuh is my AKA, and my ENT username) Violator's Warcraft III Username : your_stepfather and Mylene.Farmer Violated Rule(s) : VoteKick abuse / flaming / lying and...
- Wed Jan 23, 2019 5:54 pm
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: vk abuse appeal
- Replies: 7
- Views: 732
Re: vk abuse appeal
I also want to remind you, that the bot SPAMS Messages when a player is lagging, and its really hard, if not impossible, to read the chat, especially when you factor in the lag box also covers up part of the chat.
- Wed Jan 23, 2019 5:50 pm
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: vk abuse appeal
- Replies: 7
- Views: 732
Re: vk abuse appeal
Again, sorry if this is not my place to comment, but as the person who submitted the ban, I feel like this is a proper place for me to leave my opinion for the people who got banned. These players did not kick me because of their lack of understanding of how the rules work. I would not have submitte...
- Wed Jan 23, 2019 2:44 pm
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: Banned due to misleading vk
- Replies: 3
- Views: 362
Re: Banned due to misleading vk
As the person who submitted the ban, I feel like this is a proper place for me to leave my opinion for the people who got banned. As shown in the chat log, even i typed !yes when the votekick for me was submitted by the player "bmwputin" When you have a player lag out, its very hard to see...
- Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:40 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] Requst to Ban bmwputin
- Replies: 1
- Views: 216
[DOTA] Requst to Ban bmwputin
Replay Link : http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/view_replay.php?file=11657007.w3g Game Name : [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #37 Your Warcraft III Username : Fook (other name is Frenzuh, which is my ENT username on forums.) Violator's Warcraft III Username : bmwputin Violated Rule(s) : VoteKick Abuse Time...
- Fri Sep 08, 2017 10:49 pm
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: Frenzuh ban appeal
- Replies: 2
- Views: 311
Frenzuh ban appeal
Warcraft user name - Frenzuh Realm / Gateway - USEAST Why I am banned - It says this when I join game ADMIN - autobanex Reason - too many autobans recorded within last three days Gamename: [ENT] Dota arem us/ca #30 Until - 2017-09-10 03:43:01 U.S. Eastern Time Yesterday (Thursday the 7th) is where a...
- Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:39 am
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: Ban appeal
- Replies: 6
- Views: 409
Re: Ban appeal
Also, When you initiate a !votekick, you should clearly explain "Who" and "How" the violator is game ruining via all chat. You are free to refuse to votekick someone when there is lack of evidence/visible rule violation. However, communicate your decision via all chat, too. If yo...
- Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:36 am
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: Ban appeal
- Replies: 6
- Views: 409
Re: Ban appeal
If a votekick is initiated to kick a visible game ruiner, all players are obligated to !yes. It is possible to game ruin by being new. In this case, votekick will only be valid if the new player refuses to learn and cooperate. Just because someone is a newbie or bad does not mean he is intentionally...