Search found 7 matches

by top1percent
Sat Dec 01, 2018 6:32 pm
Forum: General Discussions
Topic: Patch 1.30.1
Replies: 2
Views: 4427

Re: Patch 1.30.1

Thanks my man
by top1percent
Sat Dec 01, 2018 6:20 pm
Forum: General Discussions
Topic: Patch 1.30.1
Replies: 2
Views: 4427

Patch 1.30.1

I forgot to backup my wc3 installation of 1.30.1 prior to updating via battle.net. Could someone please provide a 1.30.1 installation (on a public dropbox, google drive or equivalent) or suggest some way to downgrade to 1.30.1 from 1.30.2.

Cheers
by top1percent
Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:52 pm
Forum: Processed Appeals
Topic: unfairly banned
Replies: 8
Views: 551

Re: unfairly banned

losangeles instantiated !draw as well
by top1percent
Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:51 pm
Forum: Processed Appeals
Topic: unfairly banned
Replies: 8
Views: 551

Re: unfairly banned

!afk command in meantime didn'T show actual afk players
by top1percent
Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:47 pm
Forum: Processed Appeals
Topic: unfairly banned
Replies: 8
Views: 551

Re: unfairly banned

(37:58 / Allied) losangeles: !votekick fart (37:58 / All) deomis: A votekick against player [fartypoopguy] has been started by player [losangeles]. 5 votes are needed within 60 seconds to pass. (37:58 / All) deomis: Type !yes to vote. (37:58 / All) deomis: ** Note: !votekick should only be used to k...
by top1percent
Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:34 pm
Forum: Processed Appeals
Topic: unfairly banned
Replies: 8
Views: 551

Re: unfairly banned

We did not have 4 minutes to react at all, to my recall this is false information
by top1percent
Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:23 pm
Forum: Processed Appeals
Topic: unfairly banned
Replies: 8
Views: 551

unfairly banned

top1percent : USeast/TID 114660 : Refusing to kick player : Player from other team told us they had afk player, started a votekick. We had less than 1 round to react, and could not confirm afk. Player from other team was being cocky and told us we were all banned. This player should be banned for i...

Go to advanced search