Search found 7 matches
- Sat Dec 01, 2018 6:32 pm
- Forum: General Discussions
- Topic: Patch 1.30.1
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4427
Re: Patch 1.30.1
Thanks my man
- Sat Dec 01, 2018 6:20 pm
- Forum: General Discussions
- Topic: Patch 1.30.1
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4427
Patch 1.30.1
I forgot to backup my wc3 installation of 1.30.1 prior to updating via battle.net. Could someone please provide a 1.30.1 installation (on a public dropbox, google drive or equivalent) or suggest some way to downgrade to 1.30.1 from 1.30.2.
Cheers
Cheers
- Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:52 pm
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: unfairly banned
- Replies: 8
- Views: 551
Re: unfairly banned
losangeles instantiated !draw as well
- Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:51 pm
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: unfairly banned
- Replies: 8
- Views: 551
Re: unfairly banned
!afk command in meantime didn'T show actual afk players
- Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:47 pm
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: unfairly banned
- Replies: 8
- Views: 551
Re: unfairly banned
(37:58 / Allied) losangeles: !votekick fart (37:58 / All) deomis: A votekick against player [fartypoopguy] has been started by player [losangeles]. 5 votes are needed within 60 seconds to pass. (37:58 / All) deomis: Type !yes to vote. (37:58 / All) deomis: ** Note: !votekick should only be used to k...
- Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:34 pm
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: unfairly banned
- Replies: 8
- Views: 551
Re: unfairly banned
We did not have 4 minutes to react at all, to my recall this is false information
- Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:23 pm
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: unfairly banned
- Replies: 8
- Views: 551
unfairly banned
top1percent : USeast/TID 114660 : Refusing to kick player : Player from other team told us they had afk player, started a votekick. We had less than 1 round to react, and could not confirm afk. Player from other team was being cocky and told us we were all banned. This player should be banned for i...