Search found 4 matches
- Fri Jul 21, 2017 7:24 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [LOD] frozenshg
- Replies: 4
- Views: 377
Re: [LOD] frozenshg
Your time of violation is only helpful to players who are active in LOD. If you included a timestamp, you'd probably get the attention that you desire. Why have you failed to take not of the players who refused to kick a clear and obvious game ruiner? The other team attempting to !ff should be enoug...
- Fri Jul 21, 2017 2:18 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: keero@europe
- Replies: 7
- Views: 900
- Fri Jul 21, 2017 2:15 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [LTD] Mega Multiple
- Replies: 2
- Views: 380
[LTD] Mega Multiple
Replay Link : http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/view_replay.php?file=9585015.w3g Game Name : LTD Mega #66 Your Warcraft III Username : InternetWarrior Violator's Warcraft III Username : mudman; DaMaKoNDa; HateboyKim; (ff abuse) Violated Rule(s) : !ff abuse Time of Violation (in-game or replay) : ...
- Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:05 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [LTD] shyobi uswest.battle.net,ezpzjapanez europe.battle.net,ezipzilmnsqzy europe.battle.net
- Replies: 8
- Views: 870
Re: [LTD] shyobi uswest.battle.net,ezpzjapanez europe.battle.net,ezipzilmnsqzy europe.battle.net
Nowhere in the rules is !Draw a requirement. In fact, to say otherwise is a rule violation.