ENT Gaming

Would you say that Island Defense needs More supporters or more basers or is it balanced right now

Made this so people could have a better judgement.

Statistics wrote:Builders: 13, 65%

• Murloc
• Gnoll
• Makrura
• Troll
• Pirate
• Radioactive
• Ogre
• Draenei
• Nature
• Goblin
• Panda
• Dryad
• Arachnid

Hybrids: 3, 15%

• Morphling
• Tauren
• Faerie

Supports: 4, 20%

• Demonologist
• Magnataur
• Satyr
• Huntress

I would say the balance is quite nice, I wouldn't mind seeing a new baser nor support nor hybrid as long as the concept is unique and refreshing.

Island Defense needs more Panda and more Furbolg.

I'm going to suggest a Death Knight with an awesome Skin that is a hybrid like in the Research Center you can only pick 1 of 3 upgrades where one you become supporter, one you become a baser and the other completely new to ID what would you all think about that

It seems lke a certain idea involving Panda that was in circulation for a while. One of the forms would be hunter-like, one would be a builder, and the third one would be a supporter.

+1 to an idea revolving around Panda, one could be sole base/unit support (auras, passives), another could be a more cow/demon like hunter (death coil, summon dead) and the other could be a regular baser though I'm not sure if a deathknight fits the overall theme of island defense as that kinda model seems more like titan (hero).

Just create a concept and the community can take a decision, describing a builder with a sentence or two isn't great.

If you are talking pre-GP, most "basers" should be deemed supporters, because they have weak towers, and would suck unless they are dual basing with another tower baser. For example, Gnoll with the support ward and slow, Arachnid with the re-wall and slow, Murloc with the re-wall, etc.

Only when tower basers have enough wood for towers should they be deemed "basers". Common misconception we have to fix is the terrible solo basers who feed and ruin games.

-Burn