iambackk collection of abuse
Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2024 2:32 pm
Duplicating post here incase it goes "missing" from complaints forum
Note 1:
He bans GobIln in the following post: viewtopic.php?f=25&t=147555
The following was the entirety of what he said to be banned:
(09:45 / All) GobIln: fucking mh
(11:11 / All) GobIln: noob mh snpier
(11:25 / All) prayme: keep trash talking so then i can ban u
(11:40 / All) GobIln: sniper mhmhmhmh
(12:03 / All) GobIln: mh diedie~
(12:10 / All) prayme: okey u banned 1 day
This flaming is clearly not excessive by any definition of the rules. If anyone else had made a ban request with this content, it would be denied by any mod who has ever moderated ENT. This ban was personal because he doesn't like GobIln, because he beats him often.
In fact, I can bring up examples of him doing the exact same thing - accusing others of cheating during a game. This one was after he's a moderator:
(37:17 / All) prayme: gg and stop using script
(37:19 / All) prayme: im not joking with it
Said with zero evidence, during a game so obviously no investigation is possible.
This one's before, though he denies saying it now.
(15:29 / All) ifckurcousin: maphack more son of bitch
(15:32 / All) ifckurcousin: how the hell u found me here
(15:34 / All) ifckurcousin: motehrfcker cunt
(15:36 / All) ifckurcousin: i was afk here
(15:39 / All) ifckurcousin: fcking mher
(15:45 / All) ifckurcousin: -timestamp 13:00
(15:48 / All) ifckurcousin: we gonna see
(15:52 / All) ifckurcousin: Ur slrk
He very commonly throws out MH accusations in random games on losing.
http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 208099.w3g - (43:42 / All) praythemaster: y ofc none mh lmao (after dying). Found by clicking the first loss in his profile.
In fact, I would challenge anyone to find a single other case of someone being banned for accusing another person of cheating. Back in the day xSAINTx got accused every single game and no one cared.
-----
Note 2:
viewtopic.php?f=25&t=147550
(24:53 / All) YourMomsFatAss: retard
(25:01 / All) YourMomsFatAss: fuck you
He got banned for this, even though it's clearly not excessive. Now his justification is interesting:
"flaming is not allowed especially an admin."
Now theoretically, the same rules apply to all players. However he was only banned because he flamed an admin. Again, if anyone else had made this ban request, it would have been denied.
>> Also he uses similar language regularly:
http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 209386.w3g
(19:30 / Allied) tradwhore: fckign autist
(21:11 / Allied) tradwhore: autist
(21:14 / Allied) tradwhore: u are an autist
(21:16 / Allied) tradwhore: go fuck urself
http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 209254.w3g
(21:33 / All) tradwhore: fck this team of autist
http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 209274.w3g
(14:21 / Allied) tradwhore: dude shut the fck up feeding whore moron
(21:23 / Allied) tradwhore: kill urself and stfu
>> Telling someone to kill themselves is way worse than anything anyone else did
Also this user names himself "ifckyourmom" and things like this - his names are literally flaming people worse than the people he bans.
-----
Note 3:
viewtopic.php?f=25&t=147527
In this post, 2 players go AFK for 9 minutes and reset the AFK timer during that time so we can't -kickafk them.
This clearly violates rule 2 and is called out specifically in the text of the rule --
"Do not go away from keyboard for an excessive amount of time, especially without telling other players beforehand, and/or refuse to play the game in an attempt to ruin it. Neither are you allowed to grief by resetting the afk timer."
The players ruined the entire game by doing this. However he didn't ban them, because no_rules is his friend (and obviously if he banned pay for it, he would need to ban the other).
-----
Note 4:
https://entgaming.net/openstats/dota/game/12216145/
He bans someone for leaving (even though autoban already does this), but also kicks him from the next game he had started, and not violated any rules in. By doing so, he ruined the other game, which we can assume those people wanted to play as is, not have to rejoin and switch teams and heroes.
By kicking this player, he did NOT force a draw to be made. The players did decide to draw to be fair, however it would have been within their rights to play the game out as a 4v5 and have a much easier time winning. He obviously had no idea whether or not they would draw the game or not, so this kick was iambackk deliberately giving a significant advantage to Sentinel because of one player's behavior in the previous game. This is a completely unacceptable use of kick.
-----
Note 5:
Everything in this thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&p=566130#p566130
A few things to highlight - he claims that he is allowed to reveal people's identity using the alias tool in public chat. In the past, this has been strictly against the rules for any moderator to do. In fact, we were told that we weren't allowed to use the alias tool for ANY personal reason, and only allowed to use it for moderation purposes.
> "Then for centaur i am free to said who is who, actually im not suporting players making 50 accounts especially ruiners like him."
Everyone here knows that kun isn't a ruiner at all. He's one of the best players on the server and one of the few people who (like Frank who was also accused of cheating earlier) is one of the few people who regularly beats iambackk. There's a pattern here if you care to look into it. He clearly is using his moderator power against those who are able to beat him.
> "Yes ignoring for no reason is bannable"
Any rule to cite that ignoring someone, who as I showed above routinely flames people and tells others to kill themselves, is against the rules?
-----
Final thoughts: I hoped I wouldn't have to make this, but it's clear that iambackk is only a moderator for personal gain
Note 1:
He bans GobIln in the following post: viewtopic.php?f=25&t=147555
The following was the entirety of what he said to be banned:
(09:45 / All) GobIln: fucking mh
(11:11 / All) GobIln: noob mh snpier
(11:25 / All) prayme: keep trash talking so then i can ban u
(11:40 / All) GobIln: sniper mhmhmhmh
(12:03 / All) GobIln: mh diedie~
(12:10 / All) prayme: okey u banned 1 day
This flaming is clearly not excessive by any definition of the rules. If anyone else had made a ban request with this content, it would be denied by any mod who has ever moderated ENT. This ban was personal because he doesn't like GobIln, because he beats him often.
In fact, I can bring up examples of him doing the exact same thing - accusing others of cheating during a game. This one was after he's a moderator:
(37:17 / All) prayme: gg and stop using script
(37:19 / All) prayme: im not joking with it
Said with zero evidence, during a game so obviously no investigation is possible.
This one's before, though he denies saying it now.
(15:29 / All) ifckurcousin: maphack more son of bitch
(15:32 / All) ifckurcousin: how the hell u found me here
(15:34 / All) ifckurcousin: motehrfcker cunt
(15:36 / All) ifckurcousin: i was afk here
(15:39 / All) ifckurcousin: fcking mher
(15:45 / All) ifckurcousin: -timestamp 13:00
(15:48 / All) ifckurcousin: we gonna see
(15:52 / All) ifckurcousin: Ur slrk
He very commonly throws out MH accusations in random games on losing.
http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 208099.w3g - (43:42 / All) praythemaster: y ofc none mh lmao (after dying). Found by clicking the first loss in his profile.
In fact, I would challenge anyone to find a single other case of someone being banned for accusing another person of cheating. Back in the day xSAINTx got accused every single game and no one cared.
-----
Note 2:
viewtopic.php?f=25&t=147550
(24:53 / All) YourMomsFatAss: retard
(25:01 / All) YourMomsFatAss: fuck you
He got banned for this, even though it's clearly not excessive. Now his justification is interesting:
"flaming is not allowed especially an admin."
Now theoretically, the same rules apply to all players. However he was only banned because he flamed an admin. Again, if anyone else had made this ban request, it would have been denied.
>> Also he uses similar language regularly:
http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 209386.w3g
(19:30 / Allied) tradwhore: fckign autist
(21:11 / Allied) tradwhore: autist
(21:14 / Allied) tradwhore: u are an autist
(21:16 / Allied) tradwhore: go fuck urself
http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 209254.w3g
(21:33 / All) tradwhore: fck this team of autist
http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 209274.w3g
(14:21 / Allied) tradwhore: dude shut the fck up feeding whore moron
(21:23 / Allied) tradwhore: kill urself and stfu
>> Telling someone to kill themselves is way worse than anything anyone else did
Also this user names himself "ifckyourmom" and things like this - his names are literally flaming people worse than the people he bans.
-----
Note 3:
viewtopic.php?f=25&t=147527
In this post, 2 players go AFK for 9 minutes and reset the AFK timer during that time so we can't -kickafk them.
This clearly violates rule 2 and is called out specifically in the text of the rule --
"Do not go away from keyboard for an excessive amount of time, especially without telling other players beforehand, and/or refuse to play the game in an attempt to ruin it. Neither are you allowed to grief by resetting the afk timer."
The players ruined the entire game by doing this. However he didn't ban them, because no_rules is his friend (and obviously if he banned pay for it, he would need to ban the other).
-----
Note 4:
https://entgaming.net/openstats/dota/game/12216145/
He bans someone for leaving (even though autoban already does this), but also kicks him from the next game he had started, and not violated any rules in. By doing so, he ruined the other game, which we can assume those people wanted to play as is, not have to rejoin and switch teams and heroes.
By kicking this player, he did NOT force a draw to be made. The players did decide to draw to be fair, however it would have been within their rights to play the game out as a 4v5 and have a much easier time winning. He obviously had no idea whether or not they would draw the game or not, so this kick was iambackk deliberately giving a significant advantage to Sentinel because of one player's behavior in the previous game. This is a completely unacceptable use of kick.
-----
Note 5:
Everything in this thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&p=566130#p566130
A few things to highlight - he claims that he is allowed to reveal people's identity using the alias tool in public chat. In the past, this has been strictly against the rules for any moderator to do. In fact, we were told that we weren't allowed to use the alias tool for ANY personal reason, and only allowed to use it for moderation purposes.
> "Then for centaur i am free to said who is who, actually im not suporting players making 50 accounts especially ruiners like him."
Everyone here knows that kun isn't a ruiner at all. He's one of the best players on the server and one of the few people who (like Frank who was also accused of cheating earlier) is one of the few people who regularly beats iambackk. There's a pattern here if you care to look into it. He clearly is using his moderator power against those who are able to beat him.
> "Yes ignoring for no reason is bannable"
Any rule to cite that ignoring someone, who as I showed above routinely flames people and tells others to kill themselves, is against the rules?
-----
Final thoughts: I hoped I wouldn't have to make this, but it's clear that iambackk is only a moderator for personal gain