New elo system! do you like it?

[supersexyy]

Even with 15/15 system, those who win more will have higher elo than those who lose more.

So what you're saying is, when you win more games you get a higher Elo? Who would have thought.

Armed seems to be arguing the fact that elo does not take into consideration the total number of games played and unfair matchups with autobal. Although, elo is just an approximate skill measure.

No, he's saying elo discrepancies aren't justified by the assumed win/loss chances, hence it isn't worth playing.

Why dont you guys keep the elo system as it is and just random team instead of autobal based on elo?

Which will make the problem even worse, it's the exact opposite of what they're suggesting.

It may be worth trying a flat win/loss system where your score is your net win/loss. Dc penalties can be figured out later (There's always a solution).

[eldryan]

win/loss is much worse then the current system... it will make 2v2 incredibly stupid in how easy it is to exploit for higher ELOs. right now it's not really feasible - the opposite problem - however this isn't the right approach...

[pewpew lasergun]

current system is good why change.
elo reflects skill most of the time
captain mode all games is not a viable option.
if u want to be with a friend or dont like ur team ask for a swap, we do it all the time for pata ^^

the only time elo is unfair is maybe in 2s sometimes, but most dont play 2s anyway and those who do dont care bout elo ^^

imagine elo bonus given and taken by scores, that could be fun

[nabo.]

Clear vote result: No.

No further responses.

Processed.