Bigger elo difference between 2's 3's and 4's

supersexyy · Postby **supersexyy** » Wed Jul 17, 2013 8:25 am

4v4s are more attractive to me anyway because more people = more fun :s

Iznogood · Postby **Iznogood** » Wed Jul 17, 2013 8:40 am

It's still a fact that we're having trouble playing 4's even though there are more than 8 players are online.. because some only wants to play 2's.

HealByColor · Postby **HealByColor** » Wed Jul 17, 2013 6:38 pm

how can u raise the elo when the total elo of a game is 30? if you were to do this then you win more / lose more so no real difference. I think it's fine the way it is.

Iznogood · Postby **Iznogood** » Wed Jul 17, 2013 6:46 pm

HealByColor wrote:how can u raise the elo when the total elo of a game is 30? if you were to do this then you win more / lose more so no real difference. I think it's fine the way it is.

Since when was the total elo of a game 30?

dweiler · Postby **dweiler** » Wed Jul 17, 2013 6:56 pm

Yeah I agree with Healbycolor, it makes no difference if you win/lose 20 ELO instead of 15 ELO.

In fact, people who are scared of losing ELO might be turned off by more ELO in 4v4, because you can lose too much in 1 game.

Iznogood · Postby **Iznogood** » Wed Jul 17, 2013 7:34 pm

Seems like I'm the only forum user supporting this subject so I guess it's time to put it in the archives

But if there will be more high elo players in season 2 I might dig it up again

Bigger elo difference between 2's 3's and 4's

Re: Bigger elo difference between 2's 3's and 4's

Re: Bigger elo difference between 2's 3's and 4's

Re: Bigger elo difference between 2's 3's and 4's

Re: Bigger elo difference between 2's 3's and 4's

Re: Bigger elo difference between 2's 3's and 4's

Re: Bigger elo difference between 2's 3's and 4's

Who is online