ENT Gaming

Since that EVIL LIST from n1ll3 resulted in so much drama/rage/modquit etc, i feel that topic is still not closed, and it just has to be, since everyone is still discussing about it.

My suggestion how to resolve this matter once and for all :
Mods get together, and create a list; 10-15 people who doesnt bellong in lihl - skillwise.
Then create a poll which would, ofc, be completely anonymus. Vote YES if he doesnt belong in LIHL skillwise.
And anyone who gets, for example, 20 votes or so, gets back on trial to try and proove himself. Because if like 20 people doesnt think u belong in lihl... then u are really doing something wrong

And also, there should be suggestions included in that list. If someone believes that some player deserves to be there, but mods didnt add him, he should suggest that to mods, in private, with some arguments/reply's or whatever.

Before mods decisions on this suggestion, i would like to hear opinions from players here.

This is actually a good idea, hopefully i make le cut it seems like a proh list.

U lost ur chance vendeta. Actual mods wont expode themselfs for this job... I dont critize them, just not their style...

Trouble with that approach is that people will vote according to friendship status rather than honest opinion about one's skill. Ask yourself if you would vote out someone who is your mate and on the other hand if you would objectively vote about someone you dislike. I don't think anyone here, myself included, is capable of being that objective

If you think someone is unskilled and don't belong in lihl, just find 5 recent replays of him and let mods judge, seriously, its not even that much work.

I think the idea of adding a minimum elo in season would be cool. As in anyone under, for exampled, 700 elo will be sent to trial for next season and then a decision will be made or smth like that. I think that would be interesting.

Ugh... No, that's just wrong. Why would we do that lol

People sound scared about this lol

Meshtar wrote:Trouble with that approach is that people will vote according to friendship status rather than honest opinion about one's skill. Ask yourself if you would vote out someone who is your mate and on the other hand if you would objectively vote about someone you dislike. I don't think anyone here, myself included, is capable of being that objective

exactly, like u for example will thank mick for banning me and halp, then go complain when ur friend thizz is banned
this idea sucks
meshtar is right

From day 1 in my trial, untill now, and it looks like it wont stop anytime soon, people acting like this league needs "cleaning up" from "noobs".
I just suggested fastest way to do so.

Fyi, its 20 votes, if 20 people in this small league think u suck... Then u really need to get back on trial to proove urself once again.

I will archive this since the procedure is already discussed in Micks Post.