ENT Gaming

It's time we make advances towards an !ff option

I made this topic viewtopic.php?f=207&t=121000 which got closed down quick by Haza..

Here's my demands:

- We put !ff option on trial for a period 3-7 days

- The option will be 4/4 votes needed, and could have a "countdown" to ensure that all 8 players have equal chances of leaving/getting into the next game

- After the trial period we'll have an official vote, where we can look at how it went, and decide if it's something that could benefit the league

Edit: The option could potentially be called !Avada

If the result is that the majority disliked the !ff option during trial, we can discard it and I will happily accept that decision (ok not really )

I would like mods to get to work at this asap!

I support only if this option gets named !avada or !ak (initials). We need to honor the person who selflessly promotes this option every day out there in the tough field of lihl, without any regard for his own safety and elo. Lihl needs its heroes, lets name the first one

I like the idea and will discuss it with mick and anda asap

i completly dont like it

the possibilty to have an ff is completly triggernd and make thos girls cryn whole game after failsend which easy forces no-focus.

maybe if its possible to have only 1 try to ff on his own. - to avoid spamm

but anyway why the hell u even went ff so hard?

this kind of rule will only enable ava to greif more, im pretty sure they do that enough without this function. Adding it will only lead to more wasted games.

I am tottaly against this command. Some people are whining without it for like whole games, imagine if there was a ff command and 1 or 2 guys dont want to type it.

There are many games where a 100% win has ended up being thrown by a failed call or something
however, if majority of the ppl want ff, my input is this:

1. should require 4/4 people voting it to pass
2. should only be available after 1st arena (or after a certain point of the game, like round 8)
3. enemy does not see the !ff chat to avoid interaction and all chat conflict

this is to avoid silly ff votes like after a big warrior/round 5 leak etc..

I can think of 2-3 games I had with ava in the past few days when he wanted to ff but we ended up winning. This will happen all the time if we make a ff option available. The 4/4 votes needed is a good idea, but it will still put players who don't want to ff under pressure by caller/team to do so, even if they don't agree. I think there is a good reason why we haven't had this option so far in lihl - let's keep it this way.

Just fight and win like a hero or lose with honor. There is no place for forfeit in an in-house league.

Kiwi wrote:Just fight and win like a hero or lose with honor. There is no place for forfeit in an in-house league.

Nothing else to say!

I was maybe coule times for selling, but i realised same like kiwi said, there is no place for ff!

!avada

I want to do !denied command

!Denied

I'd comment as to why this suggestion is meh, but I've already done that and you can simply read every other comment above.

tl;dr; Full of possible and probable downsides, with no real upside beside a 1 or 2 minutes gain every 100 games.

AvadaKedavra wrote:I made this topic viewtopic.php?f=207&t=121000 which got closed down quick by Haza..

AvadaKedavra wrote:Also 1 mod just denying the topic... MOD ABUSE

You seem to forget that it is not the League Staff's duty to approve or deny technical implementations. You can discuss it all you want within the community, but I consider this suggestion to be trivial and therefore, it will not be implemented.

Kiwi wrote:Just fight and win like a hero or lose with honor. There is no place for forfeit in an in-house league.

So how is you rqing LIHL because you didnt get it your way anything else then !avada ?

Kiwi wrote:Just fight and win like a hero or lose with honor. There is no place for forfeit in an in-house league.

or draw and get diddled ..

Either we should not allow players to sell or allow ff to avoid wasting time...

HazarDous wrote:You seem to forget that it is not the League Staff's duty to approve or deny technical implementations. You can discuss it all you want within the community, but I consider this suggestion to be trivial and therefore, it will not be implemented.

Hazard he still useful ...