ENT Gaming

Based on our procedure, everyone (including you supreme) got the chance now, to provide replays from those 50 trialgames if you should stay vouched or not. The fact, that the games are limited, will make it way easier to judge your relative performance.

I wont accept any personal harassment or trashtalking here. If you can provide a replay, post it, comment it and let the moderation decide in the end.

Duno what is trully expected here to be attached.. Especially from me! Do not expect I provide a peasent holder lvl 7... Therefore I provide a very normal and standard game. Nothing big happened, just good calls of whole team and win. If U wanna watch it, u loose ur time, I promise. 49 impressive games to go.
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10413615

Which part of do not trashtalk / personal harrass is 2 hard to understand for you guys ?

u keep saying that it has nothing to do with counting and that u did not make a mistake
well lets see
here is exhibit 1-

this is after 3 and b4 level 4 where u have 187 gold and 10 inc and is 3/0
4 gives 194 after round u should have 391 we tell you to make wisp(go 4/0) as aod costs 340
but you dont sure its fine

exhibit 2-

here u up a phantom into hr and have 127 g left over
big fucking mistake 6 gives 198 g
198+127= 325 how is your inc supposed to cover a 35 g difference when u have 10 inc from b4 and now u need to send for 25 more which is 500 lum

here it has everything to do with counting
if u had listened to us you could have went 4/1 easily and still held 7

Firstly, I agree a lot with what Meshtar says.

Then, obviously, the build here was pretty bad. Pure Darkness was needed. There is no need to keep arguing about it, if Supreme does not want to see it, then he won't.

We are not deleting any posts that are meant to help you with your build @Crazy_skeleton , it is pretty disturbing that all you want to do is to report and delete, when there are many sensible things said here.

To @Toolie and @boretk.panda , tune it down a bit. Especially in game it is obvious you respond stronger to him than others because he is in trial, which obviously confused him in that game and made him less able to concentrate. Also @toolie flaming someone after it happened is no use at all. You knew we had a thread for it, so just report it and try to help him improve if he wants to. No need to kick someone more who is already having a hard time.

Just post replays and comment them, if you can't provide replays with comments, dont talk.
This post is made to have a objective judgement for Supremes case. Let the Moderation check the replays you provided with or without your comments.
I wont accept ANY kind of harrasment or witchhunt.

I do not understand why you want only replays. It is kinda shocking me since both his attitude and his lack of skills are concerning here. His general attitude in the forum, in discord and in game should also be analysed here.

I know for sure trial vouches are judged both on their attitude and their skill level, why is it not the case here?

Just because you want to protect him from flame, insult, or harrassment doesn't mean you should delete ever single post made here. @Diablo_'s post and mine were, I think, respectful and we highlighted an important aspect of his attitude: the fact that he doesn't listen to any feedback and that he just wants to somehow delete all negative comments, with his little attitude of "I challenge you!"...

Kiwi wrote:I do not understand why you want only replays. It is kinda shocking me since both his attitude and his lack of skills are concerning here. His general attitude in the forum, in discord and in game should also be analysed here.

I know for sure trial vouches are judged both on their attitude and their skill level, why is it not the case here?

Just because you want to protect him from flame, insult, or harrassment doesn't mean you should delete ever single post made here. @Diablo_'s post and mine were, I think, respectful and we highlighted an important aspect of his attitude: the fact that he doesn't listen to any feedback and that he just wants to somehow delete all negative comments, with his little attitude of "I challenge you!"...

And I do not understand why u spam in this post techincal staff.

What is hard about it? We ask people to provide replays that they think are telling, so they know we look at those. We cannot watch all the 50 games on our own.

https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10427669
I did nothing good or bad here. Game lost. Game lost. 47 games to go.

https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10427933
Another game, 46 to go.

https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10429275
Nothing to comment.. 45 to go

https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10429642
supreme mid every lvl
44 games to go

http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 429721.w3g
I did nothing wrong here also + 7/2 almost free hold 7 with zeus..
43 games to go

Yes we expect people to give feedback aswell on your good games as comment on your gameplay as in every other trial aswell. Im just not doing it cause mod position btw.We had plenty of good games the last days