Page 1 of 2
GProxy++ ilo
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 2:16 pm
by ILOCOS_NORTE
Sup,
enough is enough. I always dc from bnet if I enter lihl23i instead of lihl23l or whatever.
So, here a new modified version of GProxy++ GUI.
It should protect you from battle.net dc if you enter an invalid game name.
Need sone Beta testers
afaik I didnt add a virus or something
1.) download the file
2.) unzip
3.) open wc3 folder
4.) If you already use the old GProxy++ GUI Version please deleate the following files:
"gproxy.exe" (the launch data), "gproxy.cfg" and "w3lh.dll"
5.) copy and paste the new files
ps. You can also overwrite the files with copy and paste. But make sure they have the same names
feedback over pm pls or just post in this thread
Re: GProxy++ ilo
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 7:27 pm
by Diablo_
Seems to work, sweet
Re: GProxy++ ilo
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 2:21 am
by pewpew lasergun
ILOCOS_NORTE wrote:afaik I didnt add a virus or something
i thought we agreed u gona put virus for brave only :/
shame
didnt try it yet, but thank you in advance, i hate dc when typing wrong game name
and in pub we can join faster without risk of dc hehe ^^
Re: GProxy++ ilo
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 2:26 am
by Neco
Eh, already made a fix a few weeks ago:
Link.
If yours does the same then there shouldn't be any issues!
Re: GProxy++ ilo
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:19 am
by ILOCOS_NORTE
I just noticed I accidently changed the game name indicator:
bnet_game_indicator =
[ilo]You can replace that with:
bnet_game_indicator =
[G]Its in the editor file
Re: GProxy++ ilo
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:46 am
by Krumme
but it doesn't really matter in the end does it :p?
Re: GProxy++ ilo
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:50 am
by ILOCOS_NORTE
No it doesnt realy matter
Re: GProxy++ ilo
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 12:46 pm
by Diablo_
"accidently" suuuuuuure
You probably also "accidently" added that other line in the cfg file right? ^^
Btw, it also shows whispers to you in the gproxy window. Did you change that on purpose? Just curious here.
Re: GProxy++ ilo
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 6:03 pm
by pewpew lasergun
i couldn't get it to work.
i erased all 3 files from previous version
used ccleaner to delete registry entries
did ipconfig/ flushdns
nothing worked
I still get the old gproxy entry in the game bnet connection screen.
when i put your new version regardless, it just refuses to connect.
and neco version is missing a .dll
Re: GProxy++ ilo
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 6:08 pm
by godlik3
pew i have something like that....some times it refuses to conect so i restard pc and modem and it works again!
Re: GProxy++ ilo
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 8:30 am
by ILOCOS_NORTE
pewpew lasergun wrote:nothing worked
I still get the old gproxy entry in the game bnet connection screen.
Do you mean the menu where u chose the gateway? because I didnt change the name of the gateway. Its still "gproxy"
Or do you mean the old game name indicator = [G] in the game list? Is that still the old one and not [ilo]? If you got the old one here there have to be old files somewhere. Maybe draw the files out of the folder and put them back in again.
From the feedback I got so far the version works for most people. I can offer you a Team Viewer check.
Re: GProxy++ ilo
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 8:35 am
by ILOCOS_NORTE
godlik3 wrote:pew i have something like that....some times it refuses to conect so i restard pc and modem and it works again!
I can only guess your exact problem but I think you miss the "gproxy" gateway. I have the same problem sometimes (with all versions of GProxy++ GUI) and couldnt figure out what it is. What works for me is choosing another gateway, click on Bnet (without logging in) then alt tab, close the windows of grpoxy and wc3 and restart Gproxy.
Re: GProxy++ ilo
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 2:37 pm
by Krumme
I have trouble joining with your gproxy
@ilocos_norte - is there a way we can find out whats wrong and fix it ^_^?
Re: GProxy++ ilo
Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 10:09 pm
by Muslim
ty for this gproxy norte
Re: GProxy++ ilo
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:52 pm
by nabo.
@Krumme @godlik3 @diablo_ @muslimI would like confirmation on whether this modification is working or not. Thx.