disappointed

Moderator: LIHL Staff

jack77pd
Armored Tree
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 9:29 am
Has thanked: 1 time

disappointed

Postby jack77pd » Tue Feb 03, 2015 5:11 pm

Hi all, this is what i have to read from your new lihl mod. Its to explain my vouch denie. I just copy and paste:
( To be honest, you're better than half of LIHL these days, because there are so many LIHL players who play not good. I'm willing to be strict on this in nearby future. )

User avatar
MichaelSong
Treant
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:52 pm
Location: Korea
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 7 times
Contact:

Re: disappointed

Postby MichaelSong » Tue Feb 03, 2015 5:22 pm

I already posted all the pms which we gave each other and my opinions in Administartion part before you going to appeal here for netural opinion.
I will say clearly what is your problem.

Turret : when you leak lvl 3 without their send = bad. What was worst is you leak lvl 5 , about 14 hawks without enemy sending nothing. leaking lvl 5 with turrets when they send nothing is so bad when you play turrets.

Mortar: you leaked 15 pigs at lvl 4, building unnecessary tot at lvl 5 and leak full against their send, you build 2nd tot at lvl 6 and still leaking 7 golems, you build Meliai for lvl 7. What can I say more about this ?

Nm: You go 7/2 with 2 nm, 1 swamprunner, 3 hatchlings and leaking lvl 5 ( not even holding your lane ) when your team has mortar , aqua , spawn. Can you explain your move? I think you should have defended lvl 5 for your team.
You build neotank for lvl 10 to hold bosses.

To be honest, Aqua was only replay which I thought just normal. ( making 8th oceanus at till lvl 12 was not good to be honest, but compared to other replays. )

I already asked Hutzu and Diablo_ about their opinions. Please wait and see what they say. I won't comment anymore.

Finally, Now, I really regret I did long comments on your application since I was respecting you to fix bad things.
If you want to appeal, please watch again your mortar, turret, nm replay and answer my questions.
“He who is not contented with what he has, would not be contented with what he would like to have.” - Socrates

jack77pd
Armored Tree
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 9:29 am
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: disappointed

Postby jack77pd » Tue Feb 03, 2015 5:31 pm

I have to deduce all replays posted from lihl players when they asked vouch r perfect. so why play in lihl? we can be perfect playing in pub. Absurd.

User avatar
Hutzu
Protector of Nature
Posts: 4117
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 2:48 pm
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 54 times

Re: disappointed

Postby Hutzu » Tue Feb 03, 2015 5:33 pm

@qvist please stop unleashing this garbage in here. If you got nothing but nonsense to post, then don't post at all.

@jack77pd you think his judgement was wrong about the replays?

tastay
Forest Walker
Posts: 245
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 9:47 am
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: disappointed

Postby tastay » Tue Feb 03, 2015 5:34 pm

There is literally nothing wrong with what he said

From looking at his responses you seem to be not that great of a player so stop arguing and get to improving

jack77pd
Armored Tree
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 9:29 am
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: disappointed

Postby jack77pd » Tue Feb 03, 2015 5:36 pm

I think his judgement is too severe

tastay
Forest Walker
Posts: 245
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 9:47 am
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: disappointed

Postby tastay » Tue Feb 03, 2015 5:36 pm

inb4 edited post Qvist

"Well michaelsong are you telling me that nightmare should hold 5?

Only 1 mortarbuild?

And do you think he is worse than the bottom of LIHL ?"

Yes 2 nm and one upgraded swamprunner holds 5 with ease

Yes there is only one mortor build

If I saw someone building mortors then randomly mixing in 2 tots for no reason I would rage him

User avatar
MichaelSong
Treant
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:52 pm
Location: Korea
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 7 times
Contact:

Re: disappointed

Postby MichaelSong » Tue Feb 03, 2015 5:38 pm

@Qvist

First, when you play nm and your team have mortars, aqua, spawn. And they did send at lvl 2, scouted mortar, spawn. Do you think building 2nm 1 swamprunner and 3 hatchlings and pushing 7/2, leaking his own lane, not even going mid is good play?

Second, I would not count PUB ELO to LIHL section.
LIHL is different from PUB, due to several things.
Antistuck, Cross, Merc is not allowed in LIHL, which are allowd in PUB.
If you saying Pub elo is important part, when I got unvouched from LIHL I was nearly about 2200.

Third, mortar build was worst replay I saw so far in LIHL application.

@jack77pd

Every LIHL player is not perfect, but as I mentioned up, they don't leak lvl 5 with turrets, nor they don't push hard with nm when your team play mortar, aqua, spawn.
Furthermore, they don't play mortar like that for sure ^^
“He who is not contented with what he has, would not be contented with what he would like to have.” - Socrates

User avatar
Hutzu
Protector of Nature
Posts: 4117
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 2:48 pm
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 54 times

Re: disappointed

Postby Hutzu » Tue Feb 03, 2015 5:38 pm

jack77pd wrote:I think his judgement is too severe

Well, he posted in the administration-section already to have a look at it too.

I will look at it in a bit. Locked until then to prevent further spam.

Diablo_
Protector of Nature
Posts: 3180
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 10:26 pm
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 145 times

Re: disappointed

Postby Diablo_ » Tue Feb 03, 2015 5:58 pm

I'll also have a look.
While I agree with the biggest mistakes Wolf noticed in your application I think he might have been a bit too critical (tho I think his main purpose was to give you useful feedback, not to "bash" you) :D
Not everyone plays the same way etc and mistakes like leaking 4 or 5 happens to everyone at times. But the big mistakes he mentioned really are a bit crazy (Neo for 10? Meliai for 7? 2 Tots for 5?)
Anyway, be patient until you hear from us ^^
-----
LIHL player parser, a tool to automatically parse LIHL players' Elo and create reports for it: CLICK

User avatar
MichaelSong
Treant
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:52 pm
Location: Korea
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 7 times
Contact:

Re: disappointed

Postby MichaelSong » Wed Feb 04, 2015 2:15 am

All moderators went through watching all the replays and all threads which are involved with jack77pd. After careful descisions between LIHL Moderators for a long time, we have decided not to let jack77pd enter into LIHL.
Moving to archive.
“He who is not contented with what he has, would not be contented with what he would like to have.” - Socrates


Return to “LIHL Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests