ENT Gaming

A lot of people like 2s but dont play because to much diference on elo
I am sure beep would play a lot of 2s if 15/15 for example.But he cant since 1700 elo the game would be 6/24 elo.
Can we make 15/15 elo always only on 2s?

So a 22/8 game should be 15/15? Something tells me this is broken and should not be implemented

Remove ELO and introduce net win/loss

mb it would work that it can't more than 18/12 for 2s (autoshuffle must stay ofc and swapping only if all 4 agree)
but mb thats too complicated.

I agree that the Elo gain/loss is sometimes too much off and doesn't represent the actual winning chances, but always 15/15 isn't good imo.
One possible option would be to simply alter the Elo gain/loss calculation a bit, so that (imaginary numbers) 1100 vs 1200 Elo is 18/12 instead of 20/10 etc.

or you can just have separate ELO for 3s, 2s, 4s, where a win/loss in each category has less effect on your total ELOs. winner of each season can be the one with highest TOTAL ELO (all 2v2, 3v3, 4v4 ELOs together), making each aspiring winner not just stack 4v4/etc. but play a more diverse game type.

diablo's idea seems legit to me. that shouldnt be hard to implement (is it?) and if it wont solve, it atleast reduces the problem

i like guennter's idea

another thought... @beepboopbeep just control your elo man. lose sometimes or something!

archiving