Supersexyy should not be moderator

Moderator: LIHL Staff

Should Supersexyy remain LIHL moderator?

Yes.
13
68%
No.
6
32%
 
Total votes: 19

supersexyy
Donator
Posts: 3484
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:26 pm
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: Supersexyy should not be moderator

Postby supersexyy » Tue Nov 10, 2015 7:16 pm

Older members would how my moderating has improved the league to where it is at today. Some newer members such as yourself have a certain disregard for the rules, if this disregard didn't exist you wouldn't be salty in the first place. In addition using far fetched words such as 'toxic' and 'despicable' doesn't make your complaint any more valid.

You state I used !slap, this is a lie because I haven't used this command.

You are also complaining about turning trivia on. If this is an issue to you you are welcome to post a suggestion to permanently ban the trivia bot. Most members find the trivia bot fun for a few hours and no one has raised any concerns.

I personally think it's quite immature to ridicule Diablo when he was making a report and subsequently complain about a 12 hour ban in which you clearly demonstrated you do not understand the rules.

No one likes being banned, but to insult Diablo and then myself about a 12 hour slap on the wrist is bold. Maybe that time could be used to read up on the rules rather than kicking up dirt. I say this because recently you also demonstrated a lack of understanding of the rules.

As a game mod and former lihl mod expected you to present yourself with a bit more maturity. Adding a poll and dramatising your complaint adds needless childish drama.
Image

User avatar
matdas
ENT Staff
Posts: 2805
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:38 am
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 67 times

Re: Supersexyy should not be moderator

Postby matdas » Tue Nov 10, 2015 7:34 pm

Shall I point out you coming into chat a week and a half ago, just to insult me? You have no right to determine what is mature and what is not, just for doing that. Not only that, insulting my intelligence just by what I do in real life (instead of my education) for my resume building. Nice. @Hyo and GB can attest to this one.

User avatar
Artichoke
Forest Walker
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2015 2:26 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 32 times

Re: Supersexyy should not be moderator

Postby Artichoke » Tue Nov 10, 2015 7:46 pm

Just because someone isn't active doesn't necessarily mean they're a bad mod. RadiantCrystal never plays LIHL but is a great player who always gives fair judgements. I haven't had much experience with supersexyy but he doesn't seem to have done anything worthy of being demodded.
These users thanked the author Artichoke for the post:
Psyclone (Tue Nov 10, 2015 7:47 pm)

Wolke
Forest Walker
Posts: 217
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 11:03 am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 20 times

Re: Supersexyy should not be moderator

Postby Wolke » Tue Nov 10, 2015 8:03 pm

I don´t like post like this, because decissions about somebody beeing mod or not should based on rules, facts and no personal sympathy because the mods punished you. I don´t agree with all decission supersexy made, but he is active handling reports and stuff at the forum. Despite of that i agree with nore that mods should be atleast play a minimum amount of games at any season, because the playstyle changes alot over time and a mods need what´s going on so he can participate on debatting (new) rules and know what intention existing rules have. So my call would be to add some requirements, which mods have to fullfill when they apply.

User avatar
Artichoke
Forest Walker
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2015 2:26 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 32 times

Re: Supersexyy should not be moderator

Postby Artichoke » Wed Nov 11, 2015 11:02 am

My point was neither him nor Radi have really played this season. The majority of his judgments seem to be fair and I haven't personally experienced or seen any evidence of him flaming or abusing bot commands. Perhaps there was a lack of communication this time where he didn't see Radi process the case so he processed it himself. Nevertheless, one isolated incident like this isn't reason to demod a long-time mod.

User avatar
aRt)Y
Protector of Nature
Posts: 13142
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 174 times
Contact:

Re: Supersexyy should not be moderator

Postby aRt)Y » Wed Nov 11, 2015 11:34 am

Seems like the majority is disagreeing with you.

I do strongly recommend posting a new thread to create a set of requirements for LIHL moderators though.
    Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
      Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition


Return to “LIHL Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 134 guests