Page 1 of 1

Re: Supersexyy should not be moderator

Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2015 7:16 pm
by supersexyy
Older members would how my moderating has improved the league to where it is at today. Some newer members such as yourself have a certain disregard for the rules, if this disregard didn't exist you wouldn't be salty in the first place. In addition using far fetched words such as 'toxic' and 'despicable' doesn't make your complaint any more valid.

You state I used !slap, this is a lie because I haven't used this command.

You are also complaining about turning trivia on. If this is an issue to you you are welcome to post a suggestion to permanently ban the trivia bot. Most members find the trivia bot fun for a few hours and no one has raised any concerns.

I personally think it's quite immature to ridicule Diablo when he was making a report and subsequently complain about a 12 hour ban in which you clearly demonstrated you do not understand the rules.

No one likes being banned, but to insult Diablo and then myself about a 12 hour slap on the wrist is bold. Maybe that time could be used to read up on the rules rather than kicking up dirt. I say this because recently you also demonstrated a lack of understanding of the rules.

As a game mod and former lihl mod expected you to present yourself with a bit more maturity. Adding a poll and dramatising your complaint adds needless childish drama.

Re: Supersexyy should not be moderator

Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2015 7:34 pm
by matdas
Shall I point out you coming into chat a week and a half ago, just to insult me? You have no right to determine what is mature and what is not, just for doing that. Not only that, insulting my intelligence just by what I do in real life (instead of my education) for my resume building. Nice. @Hyo and GB can attest to this one.

Re: Supersexyy should not be moderator

Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2015 7:46 pm
by Artichoke
Just because someone isn't active doesn't necessarily mean they're a bad mod. RadiantCrystal never plays LIHL but is a great player who always gives fair judgements. I haven't had much experience with supersexyy but he doesn't seem to have done anything worthy of being demodded.

Re: Supersexyy should not be moderator

Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2015 8:03 pm
by Wolke
I don´t like post like this, because decissions about somebody beeing mod or not should based on rules, facts and no personal sympathy because the mods punished you. I don´t agree with all decission supersexy made, but he is active handling reports and stuff at the forum. Despite of that i agree with nore that mods should be atleast play a minimum amount of games at any season, because the playstyle changes alot over time and a mods need what´s going on so he can participate on debatting (new) rules and know what intention existing rules have. So my call would be to add some requirements, which mods have to fullfill when they apply.

Re: Supersexyy should not be moderator

Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 11:02 am
by Artichoke
My point was neither him nor Radi have really played this season. The majority of his judgments seem to be fair and I haven't personally experienced or seen any evidence of him flaming or abusing bot commands. Perhaps there was a lack of communication this time where he didn't see Radi process the case so he processed it himself. Nevertheless, one isolated incident like this isn't reason to demod a long-time mod.

Re: Supersexyy should not be moderator

Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 11:34 am
by aRt)Y
Seems like the majority is disagreeing with you.

I do strongly recommend posting a new thread to create a set of requirements for LIHL moderators though.