ENT Gaming

i still want a 1v1 mode, i dont like that fact that we cant do it just because some players fear that it would be abused.
i dont think we should decide NO on "what if"

i think we should do the 1v1, and if its abused... then take it away or simply punish the abusers. it would be pretty simple to tell if 1 or 2 persons were abusing the system.

so many times there is only 2 or 3 players left to do nothing and forced to pub or do nothing.
can we please open a 1v1 mode, at least for this last month of the season for a trial period?

you will most like be refered to the public 1v1 hosting bot, since if we should agree to get a 1v1 bot in lihl, the elo should either be removed from that bot, or the code change, to fix the balance. So in most scenarios, you will end up being pointed towards the public 1v1 bot.

It's less about possible abusing and more about 1vs1 being too different to share its Elo with the other modes. And it could result in too easy Elo gaining as games would kinda need to be 15/15 (or at least max 10/20 with an updated Elo calculation function).

Dong wrote:you will most like be refered to the public 1v1 hosting bot, since if we should agree to get a 1v1 bot in lihl, the elo should either be removed from that bot, or the code change, to fix the balance. So in most scenarios, you will end up being pointed towards the public 1v1 bot.

Diablo_ wrote:It's less about possible abusing and more about 1vs1 being too different to share its Elo with the other modes. And it could result in too easy Elo gaining as games would kinda need to be 15/15 (or at least max 10/20 with an updated Elo calculation function).

im not sure i understand... whats so hard about just making it 15/15 just like the 2v2 bot.

cam_breezy wrote:

Dong wrote:you will most like be refered to the public 1v1 hosting bot, since if we should agree to get a 1v1 bot in lihl, the elo should either be removed from that bot, or the code change, to fix the balance. So in most scenarios, you will end up being pointed towards the public 1v1 bot.

Diablo_ wrote:It's less about possible abusing and more about 1vs1 being too different to share its Elo with the other modes. And it could result in too easy Elo gaining as games would kinda need to be 15/15 (or at least max 10/20 with an updated Elo calculation function).

im not sure i understand... whats so hard about just making it 15/15 just like the 2v2 bot.

That is not hard, its not very balanced either tho.. since 1700 elo can meet 600 elo and win/lose 15/15...

Why not make the 1v1 lihl elo a separate elo?

Just play on the 1v1 bot. Player base not big enough to have a separate 1v1 ELO for LIHL. Games don't fill fast for 1v1 so easy enough to have two people join.

Unless you can justify it there won't be a 1v1 bot. I mean essentially you can just 1v1 in pub since it's lihl player vs lihl player anyway

RadiantCrystal wrote:Unless you can justify it there won't be a 1v1 bot. I mean essentially you can just 1v1 in pub since it's lihl player vs lihl player anyway

justify what?
why do people keep referring to the pub bot, that has nothing to do with lihl, i want the lihl elo, not pub elo

im not understanding why we cant just open a 1v1?

then you provide a detailed analysis on why you think elo would improve the lihl, and the ways to prevent possible glitches.

RadiantCrystal wrote:then you provide a detailed analysis on why you think elo would improve the lihl, and the ways to prevent possible glitches.

i dont understand what you are asking of... all im asking is to open a 1v1 system so lihl players can 1v1 the same as 2v2 system.
what glitches? what improvement? just open a 1v1 with all the same things as the 2v2. how is it any different?