Page 1 of 1
Rule Updated
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2016 10:58 pm
by RadiantCrystal
After a recent internal discussion, we have adjusted the the unvouch rule on leaves accordingly, the new rule is as follows
If the player is believed to have left the game on purpose aka rage quit and there is sufficient proof, the player will be unvouched with a chance to appeal
http://wiki.entgaming.net/index.php?tit ... :LIHLGuide
Re: Rule Updated
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2016 11:26 pm
by Nore
Thanks alot! Seems to be just as we wanted it now
Re: Rule Updated
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 12:05 am
by supersexyy
Is that any different to before?
Re: Rule Updated
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 1:04 am
by RadiantCrystal
Firstly the leaver rule wasn't explicitly stated in the wki, and secondly leavers will receive a longer unvouch due to the rule reform
Re: Rule Updated
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 1:07 am
by Dong
Great.
@Supersexyy we did not have the specifc part about intentional leaving before, I believe, and many new vouches began to question the punishments given by the lihl moderation, So imo it is a nice add to the rules
-Golden Dong was here-
Edit: BoBo Radi too fast for me.. Dong out. -.-' ~~ zzz
Re: Rule Updated
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 3:59 am
by supersexyy
Well leaving is in the general rules and the general rules cover LIHL.
Re: Rule Updated
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 4:08 am
by RadiantCrystal
@supersexyy yes and now lihl has its own standards on how we evaluate it
Re: Rule Updated
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 7:54 am
by Jamo
I read: "..., the player will be unvouched for with a chance to appeal"
I don't get it. Is there a time period missing after "for" or is my english to poor to get what is meant here?
Re: Rule Updated
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 4:00 pm
by RadiantCrystal
It's a typo here, which I fixed
It reads correctly in the wiki
f the player is believed to have left the game on purpose aka rage quit and there is sufficient proof, the player will be unvouched with a chance to appeal
@Jamo Due to the nature of the league will make the unvouch duration vary based on situations but generally it will be longer
Re: Rule Updated
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 4:02 pm
by Jamo
alrighty, thanks for clearance
@RadiantCrystal