[DOTA] shabby@europe.battle.net

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

Mr71717
Armored Tree
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:31 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

[DOTA] shabby@europe.battle.net

Postby Mr71717 » Thu Nov 06, 2014 1:58 pm

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 603242.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #35
Your Warcraft III Username: mr.71717@uswest.battle.net..
Violator's Warcraft III Username: shabby@europe.battle.net
Violated Rule(s): Map Hack
Time of Violation (in-game or replay):

Suspicious incidents:

9:15
Hooks SA in fog near bot tower. His angle is correct.

12:14
Sees ES at cliff. Goes to kill ES. ES stuns. Pudge chases and hooks. Then gives up when SA approaches. Low suspicion.

14:30
Heads into secret shop corners, knowing full well there were enemies there.

14:42
Hooks a SA (dusted). SA appears out of fog (split second), but his hook went out first. Low suspicion.

21:49
Dust a SA. SA just finished a fight and it may have been a good guess so this is supporting evidence

Main Evidence
23:15
Dusted SA.


Any further thoughts:
Attachments
LastReplay.w3g
(577.8 KiB) Downloaded 25 times

User avatar
VirusHunter
Corrupted Treant
Posts: 1321
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:52 pm
Has thanked: 2 times

Re: [DOTA] shabby@europe.battle.net

Postby VirusHunter » Thu Nov 06, 2014 2:14 pm

9:15
Hooks SA in fog near bot tower. His angle is correct.

12:14
Sees ES at cliff. Goes to kill ES. ES stuns. Pudge chases and hooks. Then gives up when SA approaches. Low suspicion.

14:30
Heads into secret shop corners, knowing full well there were enemies there.

14:42
Hooks a SA (dusted). SA appears out of fog (split second), but his hook went out first. Low suspicion.

21:49
Dust a SA. SA just finished a fight and it may have been a good guess so this is supporting evidence

Main Evidence
23:15
Dusted SA.

9:15 was a blind hook that wasnt near you. if he were MH he would have nailed you just sitting there.
12:14 appears to me he was just going to a very common pudge spot and es happened to be there. sniper pinged him told him to back stating that sa was level 6 so pudge backed.
14:30 him and allies stormed secreteshop. LC went top and pudge went bot. if pudge were mhing why wouldnt he hook the tping hero and cancel his tp?
14:42 you did not appear out of fog for a split second you were straight up attack sniper for a few seconds and he dusted you while you were still visible...
20:14 what about right now when pudge passes you in his jungle and you were alone. he has a dust. he could easily have dusted/killed you if he mh.
21:49 you clearly were running towards him while still visible so that dust wasnt suspicious too me.
23:15 idk why he dusted. could be just player intuition. not seeing you everywhere else. idk.
how about when you followed him for 2 minutes from 24-26. you followed him from his woods all the way to your woods and him and silencer got ganked all 5 of you verse 2 of them and sniper showed up after. if he was MH i am pretty sure he wouldnt get caught there like that.

idk with the evidence you provided and seeing what ive seen i dont think he maphacked. but thats just me. maybe someone else finds something else. btw no fog clicks either.
Image
-auctoritas non veritas facit legem-

Hatedmaru

Re: [DOTA] shabby@europe.battle.net

Postby Hatedmaru » Wed Nov 12, 2014 12:54 am

Well after reviewing, the only real suspicious movement you could look at him was that 23:15 incident; Still i think he dusted based on intuition and ill explain why:

Shaker engaged sniper - Also they had your forest warded therefore it was already obvious doctor was incoming, and most people would believe riki would be nearby as well considering sniper low hp, so dusting there sounded like a defensive action towards sniper, therefore i can't find it really suspicious.

Also that 21:49 you were visible till almost he met you on river, therefore he dusted which sounded logical.

All other incidents explained as Virushunter wrote.

@VirusHunter thanks for the review :)

I'm denying due to lack of evidence.

Processing


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 84 guests