[CF] Pikachugo@useast.battle.net - vk abuse/flaming

[hooplehead]

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 670899.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Castle Fight! #11
Your Warcraft III Username: hooplehead
Violator's Warcraft III Username: pikachugo
Violated Rule(s): flaming, votekick abuse
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 11:53 - end for vk abuse; 22:34 flaming
Any further thoughts:

[ShadowZz]

(11:53 / Allied) pikachugo: !votekick bird
(11:59 / Allied) apexeispolu: !yes
(12:02 / All) Master_RPer: !yes

(21:06 / Allied) pikachugo: !votekick boy

(26:29 / Allied) pikachugo: !votekick boy

(40:06 / Allied) pikachugo: !votekick boy

(42:53 / All) pikachugo: !votekick bird

@hooplehead Whilst it is vote kick abuse unfortunately flaming is not breaking a rule.... Try !ignore (Name) next time

The guy didn't let up all game. Also there were two participants in the initial vote kick. Should be handled accordingly.

[hooplehead]

maybe I am reading the wrong rules? Bullet 2 under general rules specifically says no flaming.

http://wiki.entgaming.net/index.php?title=EntGaming:Rules

[tinkertonker]

flaming is technically a rule but I never see it enforced.

[ShadowZz]

No one is going to get banned for flame when you are given the choice to !ignore them and no longer have to worry about it. You make the choice in game to not !ignore them....

[hooplehead]

I don't see what the !ignore option has to do with anything when it is his behavior that is in question. Either he has broken ent rules or he hasn't. If he has broken them and ent staff refuse to enforce those rules, then they establish a policy of selective enforcement. And btw, I used /squelch on pika in game.

[Hatedmaru]

Locked till review..

[Hatedmaru]

After reviewing:

Banning pikachugo@useast.battle.net for 3 days (Flaming / Votekick abuse)

And answering previous posts: Flaming is indeed bannable if excessive/racist.

Thanks for reporting

Processing