Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 886804.w3g
Game Name: [ent] legion td mega #8
Your Warcraft III Username: AssOpener@useast.battle.net
Violator's Warcraft III Username: MassKrakens@useast.battle.net
Violated Rule(s): Refusing to send with the team, nearly resulting in a loss had we not carried him.
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 53:00
Any further thoughts: After level 20, the team decided to income send 21 and 22, then save send for level 27. MassKrakens decided that he did not want to play with the team and instead sent solo on 24. Had we not carried him, we would not have won the race to the king on 27, which we won by a few seconds. His lack of teamplay, and flagrant disobeying of the team's wishes should result in a temporary ban so he can reflect on his actions. Thank yo
[LTD] MassKrakens@useast.battle.net
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 5:07 am
Re: [LTD] MassKrakens@useast.battle.net
In my defence i was trying to win the game. I obeyed team requests to up king and not send 14. I only sent 24 because income was low and was leaking. I do not see how I can get banned for trying to win the game. We ended up winning the game too so obv I didn't hurt the team that much i was just trying to avoid leaking. Also since assopener took the time to fill out a ban request, I would please like you to watch replay where he antistuck my units after he leaked. ty
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 5:07 am
Re: [LTD] MassKrakens@useast.battle.net
I did nothing wrong but enjoy playing the game and try to win. Takes the fun out of the game when u get threatened to be banned every other game for nonsense.
-
- Aura Tree
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 4:39 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: [LTD] MassKrakens@useast.battle.net
You clearly do not understand the rules on this bot. Unfortunately for you, ignorance is no excuse. The team decided to save and send 27 to win. You failed to contribute your part. THANK GOODNESS we saved up enough lumber without you to win it by ourselves, your decision could have very easily made us lose the game. This is a team game. Emphasis on the TEAM. Not a single man out there doing his own thing. That type of play is frowned upon and should result in a temporary ban. Also, anti-stucking your units to catch my leaks is not illegal, and you should be thankful.
Re: [LTD] MassKrakens@useast.battle.net
@masskrakens, you can not use this thread to ban @AssOpener for anti-stuck. You will need to create a new ban request for moderator to consider it.
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 5:07 am
Re: [LTD] MassKrakens@useast.battle.net
Look I play this game to relax and have fun not to listen to some kid whine about how he almost lost a game. Everything you stated is your opinion on "how to win the game".I always play with team n me sending for income hardly almost cost us when i still sent with team on 27 and i honestly wasn't reading chat when u guys said to save. I always type gg after every game usually unless I miss it, draw when it is unfair, and never leave early unless I lag out. i just wanna play and have a good time and i think all this threatening over bans is ridiculous just because only you were not satisfied with my game play. Then going on with a cocky attitude how you carried me and this and that i dont claim to be a pro lol but im not a bad player either.
Please I beg you lighten up relax and enjoy the game.
Please I beg you lighten up relax and enjoy the game.
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 5:07 am
Re: [LTD] MassKrakens@useast.battle.net
@lupin hey ty for the info but it's not in my nature to fill out ban requests i feel guilty and would like to see everyone enjoy the game unless they are hacking or violating major rules and i dont really consider the antstuck he did game ruining but ty for your time in this matter
Re: [LTD] MassKrakens@useast.battle.net
After reviewing:
Sent on round 24, still as mentioned by MassKrakens himself, he sent for income - Might not have been the best decision, yet one instance isn't enough to provide a ban. Still @masskrakens pay attention to your team in future games to avoid these situations.
Denied
Processing
Sent on round 24, still as mentioned by MassKrakens himself, he sent for income - Might not have been the best decision, yet one instance isn't enough to provide a ban. Still @masskrakens pay attention to your team in future games to avoid these situations.
Denied
Processing
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests