Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=7084709
Game Name: Dota APEM US/CA #49
Your Warcraft III Username: Lust.@USEast
Violator's Warcraft III Username: GetStomped@USWest
Violated Rule(s): Not votekicking an intentional game ruiner
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 21:15/ 34:31/ 40:31
Any further thoughts: At what point does repeatedly dying become intentional feeding? Noob or not Jugg repeatedly refused our advice and scourge wouldn't vote to kick. GetStomped refused to vote three times and continued to feed on Jugg.
We tried advising Jugg numerous times throughout the game and he wouldn't listen(27:15/29:07 for example). Mod or not refusing to kick an obvious game ruining feeder is against ENT rules. We tried to help jugg numerous times even before trying to kick and to think that we wouldn't at least try to help him prior is not a valid argument. DotA is a team game and we made every effort to offer advice and we wouldn't have tried to kick him had we not.
This is all made worse by the fact that GetStomped holds mod status and still refused a vote on obvious ruining. Simply poor sportsmanship.
Thanks for your time.
[DOTA] GetStomped@USWest
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Plague Treant
- Posts: 1525
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 9:35 pm
- Location: Motherland
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 26 times
Re: [DOTA] GetStomped@USWest
Get stomped did nothing against the rules or what a mod is supposed to do, and was not the only one who didn't kick.
Simply by reporting getstomped for not voting to kick a "ruiner" and not actually reporting this "ruiner" for the game ruining, aren't you confirming it yourself that jugg was not a ruiner but just a noob?
If not, why not report him first and foremost?
Moreover, since get stomped was on opposite team he was not as aware of juggs behavior or team chat. AND he did kick him at 42 mins when it was explained that jugg was not listening to team's advice...
Very confused by this post, denied.
Simply by reporting getstomped for not voting to kick a "ruiner" and not actually reporting this "ruiner" for the game ruining, aren't you confirming it yourself that jugg was not a ruiner but just a noob?
If not, why not report him first and foremost?
Moreover, since get stomped was on opposite team he was not as aware of juggs behavior or team chat. AND he did kick him at 42 mins when it was explained that jugg was not listening to team's advice...
Very confused by this post, denied.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests