[LTD] AvadaKevadra@europe - 2nd Opinion

[maj]

Main topic is here:

https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=84301

I would like a second opinion

Code: Select all

On level 3 at the point you could have upped attack 3 it was already too late to save a heal.


We used 2 heals. Not 1. And upping would have made us use 1 heal. King had 2 attack from when the creep hitted him till the end. So it was just required 1 up to save a heal.

Code: Select all

Nothing wrong with him leaking level 10 with this units. You guys goot destroyed hard anwyway, not his fault.


I agree. But this shouldn't a reason for throwing. It is clear he tried to make us lose faster. Who would go 7/7 when you have 0 heals? His attitude during the whole game was basically "you guys suck, lets die plz "

We would have died probably anyway, would this excuse a player for, let's say, sell all his towers? I don't think so.
The team is composed by 4 people, why would 1 decide the outcome of a game for the others 3?

Code: Select all

One solo sned on level 8 isnt enough to warrant a ban.


If you take only this action ok, but you need to check the whole attitude during the game

[Jabba41]

Just to clearify one thing.

He could have upped attack to 1 ofc, still 2 hit on the creeps. As soon as it would be possible to up to 3 it was too late to save the 2nd heal.

You expect him to keep attention to your build etc and say he failed on 5 because he didnt OB. But when he pays attention on the lumber of his team its a bad thing? Double standarts

[maj]

Just to clearify one thing.

He could have upped attack to 1 ofc, still 2 hit on the creeps. As soon as it would be possible to up to 3 it was too late to save the 2nd heal.

You expect him to keep attention to your build etc and say he failed on 5 because he didnt OB. But when he pays attention on the lumber of his team its a bad thing? Double standarts

Jabba, king HAD 2 ATTACK, he just needed 1 up to save us heal (3 attack on level 3 is one hit). Noone else could up.

He even said why he didn't up. "No win with this team". Why do you think that's ok?

[AvadaKedavra]

I said "No win with this team" When we leaked 45 to king on lvl 3, which is quite absurd and tilted me pretty hard xD

You are making connections between things to make it look like I tk'ed on purpose, in a game where we all got owned. Calm ur ladyparts please

[maj]

I said "No win with this team" When we leaked 45 to king on lvl 3, which is quite absurd and tilted me pretty hard xD

You are making connections between things to make it look like I tk'ed on purpose, in a game where we all got owned. Calm ur ladyparts please

Code: Select all

(07:55 / Allied) XXXDESTROYERXXX: no up no shit?
(08:02 / Allied) AvadaKedavra: no winning with this team sorry


???
theres no talk i cut between these two lines.

[AmnoN]

Re-reviewed
@maj I would not recommend getting into a habit of requesting 2nd opinions on ban requests where you do not like the outcome. Jabba provided pretty good reasons for denying it. I also have some reasons of my own.

Denied

[aRt)Y]

@AmnoN As the OP requested a second review, it shall be granted to him. Please elaborate in full why you denied his request as well. Shouldn't take too long.

@maj fyi as requested.

[AmnoN]

@maj @art)y The player played with the team the rest of the game - upped king when necessary and sent with team (8 was an anomaly). Not really much else to talk about here - cannot ban for someone saying something (apart from flaming) and the actions really did not support a "team killing" attitude.