[DOTA] tech_king.@useast.battle.net -afk grief and disco-inferno.@useast.battle.net-afk grief

[r4wr]

Replay Link:
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #31
Your Warcraft III Username: r4wr.@uswest.battle.net
Violator's Warcraft III Username: tech_king and disco-infernal
Violated Rule(s): afk grief
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): sniper at 18 min and techies at 40 minutes
Any further thoughts:
Sniper died early in the game and stated he would afk farm and not help team. Didn't bother to help defend bot rax. Techies afk grief when were getting raxed mid.

[r4wr]

link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 726005.w3g

[Disco-Infernal]

I didn't afk grief at any point. I was an active participant the whole game, and ended up as the top player on our team. How did i attain level 25 with a positive kd and many assists if i were afk?

Kid's just mad that i !ignored him. Didn't afk, didn't game ruin, didn't do anything worthy of a ban.

[Disco-Infernal]

Oops sorry, not lvl 25, lvl 21

[BeerLord]

"Sniper died early in the game and stated he would afk farm and not help team. Didn't bother to help defend bot rax. Techies afk grief when were getting raxed mid."
This simply is not true. Sniper did indicate early that he was going to farm as an expression of frustration at the team play, but he tp'd to base when sentinel attempted to rax bot, and he was an active participant in the game throughout. Techies was not afk/grief when mid was getting raxed. He helped defend it and prevent sentinel from raxing at that time.
Denied