Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=8002279
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #15
Your Warcraft III Username: Outrolled@europe.battle.net
Violator's Warcraft III Username: teracota@europe.battle.net
Violated Rule(s): Teamkill, Solosend, SPLIT multiple levels,
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): pretty much 5+, he leaked EVERY SINGLE ROUND. He didnt send with team on 12, 13, 14...
Any further thoughts: Fking sad, 1 teamkill, 1 ragequit, 1 solo sender, 1 ignores, 2 guys forfeit ... gg
[LTD] teracota@europe.battle.net
Moderator: ENT Staff
- Vendeta
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 653
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:58 pm
- Has thanked: 72 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
Re: [LTD] teracota@europe.battle.net
@teracota had mudmans, which is kinda expected to leak on 5 with send, 7,8 and 10. He did leak both 6 and 9, but he pushed well. He was 7/6 on arena with 1100 value, he did his best, noone tryed to help him with his build. Leaking with bad units - i think thats not ban. Later after 10, he didnt have any unit to recover, which also happens a lot, so u shoul have considered that, and trying to get your win on some early level.
He didnt solo send at all, any level, there was 3 of u in game, and 2 of them sent, u sent later.
He also didnt split any level, everything was regular.
From my point of view, watching replay and reading chat log, whole game u were forcing sends, making calls, etc. So, on those sends 12,13,14 only you and yellow sent, pink and green didnt want to go for income sends, they havent agree on your call, so u tryed to force it. U sent anyway and just said GO. Thats not how this game works. This is team game.
For this game, my opinion is that teracota doesnt deserve ban at all, he didnt do anything wrong, all those sends u were forcing, and wanted other people to obbey. For this, u should get warning for forcing, and try to play like u have teammates, noone is obligated to listen to you.
I hope my reply helps to mods, that is what i am trying to do here.
Cheers !
He didnt solo send at all, any level, there was 3 of u in game, and 2 of them sent, u sent later.
He also didnt split any level, everything was regular.
From my point of view, watching replay and reading chat log, whole game u were forcing sends, making calls, etc. So, on those sends 12,13,14 only you and yellow sent, pink and green didnt want to go for income sends, they havent agree on your call, so u tryed to force it. U sent anyway and just said GO. Thats not how this game works. This is team game.
For this game, my opinion is that teracota doesnt deserve ban at all, he didnt do anything wrong, all those sends u were forcing, and wanted other people to obbey. For this, u should get warning for forcing, and try to play like u have teammates, noone is obligated to listen to you.
I hope my reply helps to mods, that is what i am trying to do here.
Cheers !
D.S. 1989
- Jabba41
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 7435
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2014 7:56 pm
- Location: Germany - Hannover
- Has thanked: 194 times
- Been thanked: 158 times
Re: [LTD] teracota@europe.battle.net
(19:07 / Allied) 103.131: send 12 and 13
(19:10 / Allied) teracota: nmo
(19:11 / Allied) 103.131: and try hold
Later you agreed on it, forcing pink into the send. Not caring about greens or his opinion. Pink followed on 12 (not full) and 13. Green didnt.
You guys had a very poor communication and teamplay. I wont count this as refusing to send as you forced your team into sends and didnt waited for their opinion or just ignored it.
Regarding his play. Just a bad game. Nothing banable.
Send me your best Sloth pictures for instant unban*
*individual results may vary
*individual results may vary
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests