fcu@useast.battle.net, nebulastorm@entconnect

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

Slimmons
Resource Storage
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:26 am

fcu@useast.battle.net, nebulastorm@entconnect

Postby Slimmons » Fri May 03, 2013 9:48 am

Your Warcraft III username: Di]X[iE
Violator's Warcraft III username: fcu, nebulastorm
Game name or map name:[ENT] DotA apem A-BAL us/ca #62
Approximate date/time of game (alternatively, link to a Stats page):https://clanent.net/findstats.php?id=1341199
Rule player violated: flaming, game ruining, griefing, item selling/destroying.
Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer):
fcu:
*at 5:58 he threatens to feed if I gank top (no idea why). at 13:00 trash talking begins, i had already ignored, but conversation continued.
*at 14:08 opposing team says they were in his last game and had to ignore him too.
*at 16:15 he sells his items and buys branches.
nebulastorm:
*at 21:00 nebulastorm says his last words in the game. for the rest of the game he won't push or assist. probably not bannable, but i'm pretty sure him and fcu were friends, and he was mad about kick.

Any further thoughts: not sure nebulastorm broke any rules, but he definitely cost us the win. fcu definitely broke rules, an

User avatar
QTriNitY
Donator
Posts: 1773
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 11:05 pm

Re: fcu@useast.battle.net, nebulastorm@entconnect

Postby QTriNitY » Fri May 03, 2013 12:55 pm

!Approved

fcu@useast.battle.net is further banned for game ruining - 7 days

The was a 1 day auto ban which he served for plug pulling in this game. Adding 7 more days to it for massing ironwood branches.
autoban autoban: left at 1129/2469 [ENT] DotA apem A-BAL us/ca #62 2013-05-03 00:00:00 3 May 2013
[spoiler=]
1.png
1.png (1.54 MiB) Viewed 281 times
11.png
11.png (1.63 MiB) Viewed 281 times
[/spoiler]

Game info - https://clanent.net/findstats.php?id=1341199

**********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

As for nebulastorm@entconnect

Since your aim was to get rid of Kunkka and not much interested in winning the game, why did you have to report him when he chooses not to help out?

From the dialogue and vote kick participations, Nebulastorm is not much of a friend to the Kunkka player.

No bans will be issued on any more players. Moving to processed.

[spoiler=]
2.png
2.png (1.41 MiB) Viewed 279 times
[/spoiler]


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 83 guests