Replay Link:
Game Name: dota apem us 69
Your Warcraft III Username: X.2099
Violator's Warcraft III Username: rained
Violated Rule(s): maphack
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): minute 22 end of demo
Any further thoughts:
or [Dota] Rained useast.battle.net
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2016 7:11 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
-
- Basic Tree
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 5:34 am
[Dota] Rained useast.battle.net
Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 433448.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #69
Your Warcraft III Username: MaRiNeChato
Violator's Warcraft III Username: Rained
Violated Rule(s): maphack
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): minute 31
Any further thoughts: I picked up a DD @ minute 28 noone see it there are no wards, I went mid to kill a few creeps then after they lose vision from me... I lothar to Roshan, meepo went straight to roshan. He stoped using all the meepos he only focus on 1. Went straight to Roshan and didnt stop until get near me... Team's player complained about meepo the whole game about MH but it is my only oportunity to see that meepo MH or he did a nice GOOD GUESS to check roshan for first time @ minute 30, exactly when I was doing it. Then he decided to put a ward after it.
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #69
Your Warcraft III Username: MaRiNeChato
Violator's Warcraft III Username: Rained
Violated Rule(s): maphack
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): minute 31
Any further thoughts: I picked up a DD @ minute 28 noone see it there are no wards, I went mid to kill a few creeps then after they lose vision from me... I lothar to Roshan, meepo went straight to roshan. He stoped using all the meepos he only focus on 1. Went straight to Roshan and didnt stop until get near me... Team's player complained about meepo the whole game about MH but it is my only oportunity to see that meepo MH or he did a nice GOOD GUESS to check roshan for first time @ minute 30, exactly when I was doing it. Then he decided to put a ward after it.
-
- Basic Tree
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 5:34 am
Re: [Dota] Rained useast.battle.net
I just check that it is a new acct... I wasted my time xD
https://entgaming.net/openstats/dota/player/rained/
https://entgaming.net/openstats/dota/player/rained/
- MakeItRain
- Resource Storage
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 7:25 pm
- Location: On top of you.
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: [Dota] Rained useast.battle.net
I was going to do Rosh myself at that time (bought observer wards for it as well) and wasn't looking for you at all. I didn't know if anyone was at Rosh until I got there to see the half HP Rosh and you, and that is all there is to it. If I knew you were there, i wouldn't have used one meepo to go there in the first place, especially when you had a ward in the river showing my isolated meep. Also in case you wanted to know and view my other meepo games too, my main is rain. @useast.
I guess size ain't everything, eh? Eh!? Ha ha ha AWW IT IS.
7 and a half cut in circumference and 6' 9"
7 and a half cut in circumference and 6' 9"
- FalenGa
- Oversight Staff
- Posts: 7857
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 2:38 pm
- Location: Mars
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 138 times
Re: [Dota] Rained useast.battle.net
Hello @marinechato .
One incident that can be considered suspicious, is not enough to convict someone for map hack.
In this case, the accused player provided his explanation on the event, and it sounds legit and very common.
Unless you can provide more evidence against him, this ban request will be denied.
One incident that can be considered suspicious, is not enough to convict someone for map hack.
In this case, the accused player provided his explanation on the event, and it sounds legit and very common.
Unless you can provide more evidence against him, this ban request will be denied.
- FalenGa
- Oversight Staff
- Posts: 7857
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 2:38 pm
- Location: Mars
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 138 times
Re: [DOTA] rained US east
Hello @KingNothing2099 .
One incident that can be considered suspicious, is not enough to convict someone for map hack.
In this case, the accused player provided his explanation on the event, and it sounds legit and very common.
Unless you can provide more evidence against him, this ban request will be denied.
One incident that can be considered suspicious, is not enough to convict someone for map hack.
In this case, the accused player provided his explanation on the event, and it sounds legit and very common.
Unless you can provide more evidence against him, this ban request will be denied.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests