Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=8776940
Game Name: [ent] civilization wars #33
Your Warcraft III Username: Noctosphere
Violator's Warcraft III Username: redshirt & samsonsordon
Violated Rule(s): trolling, stopped playing
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): I noticed they stopped playing at 28:31
Any further thoughts: I don'T know why, but we were winning, but suddenly, they both stopped playing.
I asked top player to help mid defend his lane since they were rushing and he got rid of his lane, but nothing was done, neither by top nor by mid.
it ended up that we got defeated...
Also, after we shared control, someone deacted my market around 26:37
[CW] samsonsordon & redshirt stopped playing when we were winning
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:35 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: [CW] samsonsordon & redshirt stopped playing when we were winning
It was an all in rush mid and no one from Eastern helped to defend. No one stopped playing, and I attempted to defend middle by myself and Samsonsordon built 1 camp, so he was still playing.
Noctosphere is equally culpable for not helping defend the rush mid. While there were misplays on both teams, no one stopped playing or intentionally lost the game. Not playing the game the way Noctosphere thinks it should be played should not result in a ban.
Noctosphere is equally culpable for not helping defend the rush mid. While there were misplays on both teams, no one stopped playing or intentionally lost the game. Not playing the game the way Noctosphere thinks it should be played should not result in a ban.
-
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:35 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: [CW] samsonsordon & redshirt stopped playing when we were winning
it was past 30 minutes and you still hadnt gun tower to help defend, i call you stopped playing...
Also, you never asked for my help
Also, you never asked for my help
-
- Basic Tree
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 2:48 pm
Re: [CW] samsonsordon & redshirt stopped playing when we were winning
Hello there :3
I laughed for about 20 minutes after playing the game.
Thank you all for the game
P.S. I saved that replay, it's amazing
I laughed for about 20 minutes after playing the game.
Thank you all for the game
P.S. I saved that replay, it's amazing
Last edited by ThisNameWasFree on Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:33 pm, edited 4 times in total.
-
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:35 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: [CW] samsonsordon & redshirt stopped playing when we were winning
weird, i bough my name, it wasnt free
Re: [CW] samsonsordon & redshirt stopped playing when we were winning
Noctosphere wrote:it was past 30 minutes and you still hadnt gun tower to help defend, i call you stopped playing...
Also, you never asked for my help
Your reply shows a lack of understanding of basic game mechanics as well as a lack of consideration for others.
I spent all my gold on units to defend the lane. I did not have university as I had to stop teching to attempt to save the lane. Please spend some time considering resource constraints before posting a reply. You could have gotten gun towers as you were ahead in tech or you could have built anything middle to help.
You were aware that the lane was being rushed and pinged it an obnoxious number of times, but chose not to help out. Am I disappointed that neither lanes helped to defend an all out rush? Yes it is disappointing to lose a game that could have been won.
Once again, Noctosphere is equally culpable for not helping defend the rush mid. Everyone made bad plays and just because he got mad at losing doesn't mean that people should be banned.
-
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:35 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: [CW] samsonsordon & redshirt stopped playing when we were winning
actually, what i dont understand is that we had all lane for most of the game.
one of their player had a build limit exceeded by a lot, so his income was very low.
and from what i saw at the end of the game, you hadnt build a lot of unit, so no, you werent defending at all.
all you were doing is marketing... so dont say you hadnt money to defend
one of their player had a build limit exceeded by a lot, so his income was very low.
and from what i saw at the end of the game, you hadnt build a lot of unit, so no, you werent defending at all.
all you were doing is marketing... so dont say you hadnt money to defend
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests