[DOTA] mh and meepo script

[iambackk]

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9269584
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #83
Your Warcraft III Username: iambackk
Violator's Warcraft III Username: qwertyy
Violated Rule(s): mh + script for meepo
Time of Violation (in-game or replay):
Any further thoughts:
23.28 game time : just paid attention about this move, he used nets 1sec before to had vision of us (check it to 1/2 speed or you won't catch him).
25.50 ok you will said it's stupid to think that, from start of game he tp every lane (on creeps) to go farm, and sudenly, without any vision of me for last 15sec, he tp at tower and waited lc to rush on creeps found me (after i came), why he didn't tp on creeps instantly? affraid of me? i was moving at shop to buy a tp.
26.10 wtf? he were top, runing to farm next wave (we were coming from fog of war), so he tp mid to farm the lane, 5sec after (ofc we moved from our place), he come back top?
32.50 wtf? he were going bot "using dager and everything" to run fast bot, and sudenly when bara charged from the fog, meepo spoof back his hero? lol
36.30 the fuck was this jump perfectly on sk and me? and ofc in the fog of war
40.26 did u ever saw someone who can spoof so fast without a script for meepo especially without any vision of me? i'm a good meepo player and i can tell you, it's impossible to do it that fast.
43.15 can you explain me this move? well, paid attetnion to bara charging on silencer, meepo used dager on the perfect way to catch bara (meepo full item doesn't need items from secret shop)
44.6 i could be everywhere at this moment with ember, will you tell me it's lucK? add'ed with all other moves?
44.35 wtf is this jump on sk in the fog of war? perfectly on sk with a perfect net, it's luck also?

I wasted lot of time for check this replay, and i'm sorry for my bad behaviour, i was just bored to lose vs a f****ing mher

regards

[darklord1992]

claims that meepo mh + script but fails to mention a few things:

@12:10 - Scourge was taking bot tower and teal was hiding in the trees, if meepo mh then why didn't he go after him?
@13:10 - Could have gone after bara
@19:07 - Could have gone after bara while he was farming scourge woods.
@22:15 - Meepo tried to rosh while axe had ward in the river. (If meepo mh then why go to rosh while its warded)
@23:28 - Meepo had an observer ward and saw the team go into their jungle.
@25:35 meepo could have gone after axe while axe was farming scourge ancients

And script means that all the geomancers poof at the same time, and obviously that isn't the case here. If you actually watch the replay you can
see many times where meepo's poofs are delayed by a few milliseconds

The rest is not even worth reviewing.

[iambackk]

about all the moves your talking about, it's bullshit, ofc someone who mapahck won't make it to obvious, don't be that ridiculous man.
Then about 23.28 you had no vision of my team, even with ur wards at top rune.
About the move at 25.35, once again, an mher won't make it so obvious.
And about the script, you can used it during the game, and the move i'm talking about at 40.26 it's exactly what u said, ALL GEO POOF AT THE SAME TIME, you started the game without the script and u put it on during the game, it's to obvious.

Anyway, let admin decide about this, i give them many timelines, and all this moves are proving that u maphack, and you are using a script, i think admiting ur mistake is the only thing u have to do.

[darklord1992]

explain how it is bullshit lol, net provides vison of where you throw it, so throwing it up hill where the enemy team had gone should not be considered maphack. There were many times meepo could have used his "maphack" to his advantage without it being obvious lol. There were many times he would tp back home to be cautious when enemy team isn't even near him but yet you claims he has maphack.

[iambackk]

dude just accept the fact, ur mhing and using a script, stop spaming thanks.
(about net u just fucked urself, for the move at 23.28, u said first "i had a wards" (who's a lie), adn now u said "net provides vision", and how did u net here right their on us without any vision? i told u, stop spaming ur bullshit please, u clearly maphack, now just let admin decide about this

[darklord1992]

yeah please let the admins review you're obviously just hurt that you lost smh

[Dhamma]

net provides vison of where you throw it,

this is not dota 2.

in dota 1, net has about 25% chance to momentarily show you the enemy if the net catches someone. If the net misses, zero chance of showing you anything. If the net actually does land, all you get is the view of the hero caught for a split second, not the vision of the net's path. But this is still maybe 25% of the time, most of the time even if it catches in fog, it doesn't give you any vision whatsoever.

In dota 2, if enemy blinks into trees, you could throw a bunch of nets and usually see where he is when one of them lands. Impossible in dota 1. Net is kinda bugged for the worse on this map, in dota 2 it works way way better, there are 2 more benefits you don't get in dota 1 with net.

[darklord1992]

no you're wrong i just checked and you can check too, that if you throw the net in fog it will show you the vision of the fog.

[darklord1992]

dude just accept the fact, ur mhing and using a script, stop spaming thanks.
(about net u just fucked urself, for the move at 23.28, u said first "i had a wards" (who's a lie), adn now u said "net provides vision", and how did u net here right their on us without any vision? i told u, stop spaming ur bullshit please, u clearly maphack, now just let admin decide about this

yes there was a ward, if you actually watched the replay the scourge clearly saw you guys go into the jungle, throwing net provides vision in fog so throwing it in where the enemy clearly had gone is, unfortunately, not maphack.

[SeriouslyStrange]

Locked.

[Quentin]

I checked all clicks and could not find any fog clicks.
I checked all timestamps and did not find anything suspicious.

Waiting for second opinion.

[BeerLord]

I concur.
Denied.