Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 515234.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] HELLHALT TD #96
Your Warcraft III Username: Serotonia5
Violator's Warcraft III Username: zynk , agb544 , smoky[dib]
Violated Rule(s): refused to kick afker took them 3 rounds before they kicked
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): round 2 to 5
Any further thoughts: submitting another request on zynk right after this
zynk uswest.battle.net
Moderator: ENT Staff
- thinu
- Treant
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:38 am
- Location: Poland
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Re: zynk uswest.battle.net
Ok, so this is a tricky one. My personal findings and opinion:
1) First votekick was initiated after lvl3 (during a leak) by green player at 08:59 replay time.
Teal player zynk@uswest.battle.net did command !afk, so he was aware of orange being afk. He also teased he will agree to VK when other team kick red player (new to the game and leaking badly, which isn't any offence). Noone agrees to VK.
2) Green player Serotonia5 tries to initiate second votekick, players agb544, zynk, Erwin type !yes, but since there is build-in delay on -votekick command it wasn't initiated.
3) 2nd VK is initiated by green player:
No reaction from blue or red, teal player Zynk tease with wrong command.
4) 3rd votekick is started by Zynk:
I strongly believe this was joke VK by Zynk, he saw how much advantage he is gaining by not kicking, did the VK to not be accused of breaking the rules, he told his team to not say !yes:
and was caught by surprise when only 2 votes were enough, when yellow player ErwiN finally decided to go for it.
Conclusions:
I agree with a ban for players: zynk@uswest.battle.net and player smoky[dib]@europe.battle.net for refusing to kick afker.
I would issue a warning for player agb544@uswest.battle.net for refusing to kick afker. Warning instead of ban because I can see him being new to the game and ENT, and also being very much confused by blue not talking at all, and teal misleading informations and teases.
1) First votekick was initiated after lvl3 (during a leak) by green player at 08:59 replay time.
Spoiler!
Teal player zynk@uswest.battle.net did command !afk, so he was aware of orange being afk. He also teased he will agree to VK when other team kick red player (new to the game and leaking badly, which isn't any offence). Noone agrees to VK.
2) Green player Serotonia5 tries to initiate second votekick, players agb544, zynk, Erwin type !yes, but since there is build-in delay on -votekick command it wasn't initiated.
Spoiler!
3) 2nd VK is initiated by green player:
Spoiler!
No reaction from blue or red, teal player Zynk tease with wrong command.
4) 3rd votekick is started by Zynk:
Spoiler!
I strongly believe this was joke VK by Zynk, he saw how much advantage he is gaining by not kicking, did the VK to not be accused of breaking the rules, he told his team to not say !yes:
Code: Select all
(12:57 / Allied) Zynk: dont
(12:58 / Allied) Zynk: say
(12:59 / Allied) Zynk: yes
and was caught by surprise when only 2 votes were enough, when yellow player ErwiN finally decided to go for it.
Conclusions:
I agree with a ban for players: zynk@uswest.battle.net and player smoky[dib]@europe.battle.net for refusing to kick afker.
I would issue a warning for player agb544@uswest.battle.net for refusing to kick afker. Warning instead of ban because I can see him being new to the game and ENT, and also being very much confused by blue not talking at all, and teal misleading informations and teases.
---
No One Is Perfect...
No One Is Perfect...
- Albi
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2016 8:24 pm
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 74 guests