Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 706742.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega #49
Your Warcraft III Username: adamh91
Violator's Warcraft III Username: liiiillllllliii
Violated Rule(s): Antistuck to hide units
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): Level 2
Any further thoughts:
Twice he used antistuck to stop his units from going to king so we wouldn't see them.
I would ask you to check his accounts as I presume he's on a smurf account here as he knows what he is doing
[LTD] liiiillllllliii
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 1:35 am
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
[LTD] liiiillllllliii
- These users thanked the author Adamh91 for the post:
- Panopticon (Sat Aug 26, 2017 10:51 am)
-
- Treant
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 2:51 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 29 times
Re: [LTD] liiiillllllliii
4:03 <lIIIIlllllllIII> 0x11: Point order: ancestralspirit (X: 5694.35, Y: 518.40, flags: 0x0040)
At level 2, oj anti'd to catch yellow's lane with aqua and kills all but hermit. At this point, pink anti's to hide his spawn at 2.
liiiillllllliii should be banned for anti'ing to hide units.
At level 2, oj anti'd to catch yellow's lane with aqua and kills all but hermit. At this point, pink anti's to hide his spawn at 2.
liiiillllllliii should be banned for anti'ing to hide units.
- These users thanked the author pr0totype for the post (total 2):
- Panopticon (Sat Aug 26, 2017 10:55 am) • Adamh91 (Sat Aug 26, 2017 12:38 am)
- Indrial
- Treant
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2014 5:16 pm
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: [LTD] liiiillllllliii
Adamh91 wrote:I would ask you to check his accounts as I presume he's on a smurf account here as he knows what he is doing
Not knowing the rules isnt an excuse. The first message whenever you join the bot is that you should visit the forum to check the rules.
- Panopticon
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 851
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 3:03 am
- Has thanked: 347 times
- Been thanked: 40 times
Re: [LTD] liiiillllllliii
Indrial wrote:Adamh91 wrote:I would ask you to check his accounts as I presume he's on a smurf account here as he knows what he is doing
Not knowing the rules isnt an excuse. The first message whenever you join the bot is that you should visit the forum to check the rules.
You should go back and look at what you quoted, then look at what you replied.
The reported player is also subject to be banned for the name used itself.
PSA: Bigtits = Iambackk
tinker_666 = ta-ta
tinker_666 = ta-ta
-
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 1:35 am
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: [LTD] liiiillllllliii
Indrial wrote:Adamh91 wrote:I would ask you to check his accounts as I presume he's on a smurf account here as he knows what he is doing
Not knowing the rules isnt an excuse. The first message whenever you join the bot is that you should visit the forum to check the rules.
At what point did I say anything of the kind?
-
- Treant
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 2:51 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 29 times
Re: [LTD] liiiillllllliii
I think there is just a miscommunication, it's possible he believes Indrial is the violator or is simply referencing that ignorance isn't an excuse due to there being an announcement.
-
- Treant
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 2:51 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 29 times
Re: [LTD] liiiillllllliii
Not quite sure why you had to be rude, Indrial. Anyway, review is posted, a moderator will review in time.
- These users thanked the author pr0totype for the post (total 3):
- Adamh91 (Sun Aug 27, 2017 2:50 pm) • Merex (Sun Aug 27, 2017 2:48 pm) • Panopticon (Sun Aug 27, 2017 2:48 pm)
- AmnoN
- ENT Staff
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:50 am
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 34 times
Re: [LTD] liiiillllllliii
liiiillllllliii@Europe banned 3 days for AS abuse.
@indrial You clearly do not know what you are talking about - please refrain from commenting if you are not adding anything to the thread.
@indrial You clearly do not know what you are talking about - please refrain from commenting if you are not adding anything to the thread.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 105 guests