Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 899062.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega #90
Your Warcraft III Username: BlatantELOBoost
Violator's Warcraft III Username: darek_palarczyk
Violated Rule(s): Intentional teamkill / troll sending + lying about rules.
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): From beginning. Level 1 (2 mins in) antis greens units to try to prevent him from getting leak gold mid. On level 3 (5 minutes) sends dino even though had gold for furb
Any further thoughts:
Normally I know you can't report ppl for playing badly. But this guy knew what he was doing and I have proof of malicious intentions. In the previous game, we beat him and he got really mad we didnt draw: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9898895.
Then, in lobby of next game, he joins our team and starts hinting he is going to try to ruin. From lobby chat here: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/dow ... 899062.txt
[Darek_Palarczyk]: have fun this game
[Darek_Palarczyk]: hope u do good
[Darek_Palarczyk]: :^)
[Darek_Palarczyk]: yes
[Darek_Palarczyk]: i will do my best
[Darek_Palarczyk]: :>
[Darek_Palarczyk]: im gona report
[Darek_Palarczyk]: last game <-- lying about rules, can't report for not drawing.
[Darek_Palarczyk]: :^)
Then in the game, he goes 1/0 with tempests despite having harlots. Level 1, he antistucks green's units who held warriors so he can't get feed mid. He knows what he is doing it and is just trying to make us lose. 5 minutes in, we agree to send 3. He has over 140 lumber but sends dino instead, saying this:
(05:03 / Allied) Darek_Palarczyk: more income
Then basically trolls entire game until we are forced to kick him. Obviously mad from last game and trying to ruin so there's obvious intent of intentional TK
[LTD] darek_palarczyk @ useast
Moderator: ENT Staff
Re: [LTD] darek_palarczyk @ useast
After reviewing:
Starting with https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9898895 (the game where he played fine):
[*] Starts with aquas, pushes 4/0 after holding wars send on 1
[*] Sends BO on 3, and pushes 5/0
[*] 7/3, 550 aqua value on 6
Stopping here - its enough to know he does know what hes doing, and not just a bad player
http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 899062.w3g (LTD mega #90)
[*]Starts with 2 tempests (while having harlots) - while i can consider a stupid choice, sub-optimal builds aren't bannable
AS green spawn, claiming he wanted green to kill pink's warrior leak (If he had AS at 2.12 when green finishes killing, its possible he would catch the war leak; but on 2.15 he had no chance to catch it) - however hard to judge it was an intentional AS abuse imo
[*]On 3:
Team asks to send furb, and he sends a dino instead ... that was intentional, not rly "noob" as proved above (he knows what he's doing)
So:
The only situation to be considered "bannable" here is the trolling send - to which a warning is enough imo (sub optimal builds aren't bannable and that AS is so-so)
Starting with https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9898895 (the game where he played fine):
[*] Starts with aquas, pushes 4/0 after holding wars send on 1
[*] Sends BO on 3, and pushes 5/0
[*] 7/3, 550 aqua value on 6
Stopping here - its enough to know he does know what hes doing, and not just a bad player
http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 899062.w3g (LTD mega #90)
[*]Starts with 2 tempests (while having harlots) - while i can consider a stupid choice, sub-optimal builds aren't bannable
Code: Select all
2:15 <Darek_Palarczyk> 0x11: Point order: ancestralspirit (X: 5418.70, Y: 5328.88, flags: 0x0040)
AS green spawn, claiming he wanted green to kill pink's warrior leak (If he had AS at 2.12 when green finishes killing, its possible he would catch the war leak; but on 2.15 he had no chance to catch it) - however hard to judge it was an intentional AS abuse imo
[*]On 3:
Code: Select all
4:47 [Allies] BlatantELOBoost: send furbolg pink
Code: Select all
4:53 <Darek_Palarczyk> 0x10: Immediate order: [Dino] (flags: 0x0040)
Team asks to send furb, and he sends a dino instead ... that was intentional, not rly "noob" as proved above (he knows what he's doing)
So:
The only situation to be considered "bannable" here is the trolling send - to which a warning is enough imo (sub optimal builds aren't bannable and that AS is so-so)
-
- Oversight Staff
- Posts: 5183
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 5:56 am
- Location: Canada
- Been thanked: 117 times
Re: [LTD] darek_palarczyk @ useast
Reviewed and confirmed as per Zeratul.
Player darek_palarczyk@useast.battle.net warned for troll send on 3.
Processing.
Player darek_palarczyk@useast.battle.net warned for troll send on 3.
Code: Select all
(04:57 / Allied) BlatantELOBoost: why dino?
(04:59 / Allied) BlatantELOBoost: we said furb
(05:03 / Allied) Darek_Palarczyk: more income
Processing.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 109 guests