[DOTA] VK Abuse

[Abcdefg1]

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 952022.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] DotA arem us/ca #21
Your Warcraft III Username: Abcdefg1
Violator's Warcraft III Username: spadling theagonist, etc.
Violated Rule(s): VK Abuse
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): starting at 1:36, but there was probably 10 in total
Any further thoughts: Repeated vote kicks by him and his team on a fairly new player. Along with a ton of flaming as you'll see. Plus he's the most annoying kid in the world.

[DOTA_TRASHCANS]

flame and votekicks are easily displayed in the link there, not sure if the axe is throwing though :/

[nitromon]

Here's the counter BRQ: viewtopic.php?f=8&t=119656

My personal opinion?

EVERYONE in this game should be banned.

- Axe straight out feeding. Doesn't talk. Never asked for advice. Only found 1 chat, saying "sry" so he does understand English.

- Scourge all should be banned. Not one person offered any advice to Axe, offered to help, or even talk to him at all after several votekick abuses. First 1-2 votekicks were absolutely abusive b/c you cannot determine intentional feeding by item choices or 1-2 death. He could be just noob. And I'm not exactly sure what is "bba?" But sounds like Pink is impersonating an admin?

- However, as the feeding continues to stack, Sentinels CLEARLY know this guy was feeding and refuse to kick. How do we know? Because Sentinels are not offering legit communications asking about Axe or asking about the kicks. They were giving reasons such as "Well, we have a techies..." "Well... last game we had noobs..." which are ALL NONE relevant and indicates they know this Axe was feeding and purposely didn't kick b/c they were getting back at the Scourge players for a previous game.

BAN THEM ALL.

[BeerLord]

(01:36 / All) SupNub: A votekick against player [Bot_tac] has been started by player [GankHilarySwank]. 7 votes are needed within 60 seconds to pass.
abusive.
GankHilarySwank, spadling, and -Terror- voted.
(08:23 / All) SupNub: A votekick against player [Bot_tac] has been started by player [GankHilarySwank].
abusive.
GankHilarySwank, spadling voted.
(10:16 / Allied) GankHilarySwank: and caused me to die This statement was not true.
(10:26 / All) SupNub: A votekick against player [Bot_tac] has been started by player [TheAgonist].
Abusive.
TheAgonist, GankHilarySwank, spadling, -Terror- all voted.

1150 axe destroys rune.
(13:20 / All) SupNub: A votekick against player [TheAgonist] has been started by player [-Terror-].
This was an error apparently, as -terror- thought theagonist was axe.
(14:46 / All) SupNub: A votekick against player [Bot_tac] has been started by player [spadling]
Still abusive.
spadling, jywolf, TheAgonist all voted.

(14:49 / Allied) TheAgonist: or i will fucking perma ban you
Admin impersonation.
(16:23 / All) SupNub: A votekick against player [Bot_tac] has been started by player [TheAgonist]
Still abusive.
TheAgonist, GankHilarySwank, -Terror-, jywolf, spadling all voted.

1737 axe far out in lane solo and gets ganked and killed. At this point he meets criteria for game ruin even as a new player. Destroying the rune, not listening to the only advice give by his allies : (area is mined dont go there) and now not learning from his mistakes and not communicating with his team while repeatedly dying.

(21:33 / All) SupNub: A votekick against player [SupNub] has been started by player [TheAgonist]
abusive.
GankHilarySwank banned 3 days for votekick abuse and lying to deceive others into voting.
spadling, with previous bans for same, is banned 3 days for votekick abuse, repeated offense.
TheAgonist is banned 3 days for votekick abuse and admin impersonation.
jywolf is banned 2 days for votekick abuse.
-Terror- is banned 2 days for votekick abuse.