Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 130768.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #35
Your Warcraft III Username: I-AM-AMAZlNG
Violator's Warcraft III Username: i(-i-)i - u.s west noob_stalker - u.s west (slark refusing to kick)
Violated Rule(s): hardcore ruining, refusing to help. Refusing to kick after multiple warnings
Time of Violation (in-game or replay):
(13:42 / Allied) I-AM-AMAZlNG: help
(13:48 / Allied) I-AM-AMAZlNG: bara?
(13:51 / Allied) I-AM-AMAZlNG: full hp mana
(16:50 / All) I-AM-AMAZlNG: Stole aegis
(16:51 / All) I-AM-AMAZlNG: didnt help
(22:13 / Allied) I-AM-AMAZlNG: 19:30 bara still full mana/hp
(22:17 / Allied) I-AM-AMAZlNG: refusing to help team
(22:20 / Allied) I-AM-AMAZlNG: Bara still 0-0-0
(24:03 / Allied) I-AM-AMAZlNG: 21:25 bara refuses to charge
(24:06 / Allied) I-AM-AMAZlNG: just sits in base
(24:08 / Allied) I-AM-AMAZlNG: never comes with team
(32:25 / Allied) I-AM-AMAZlNG: bara doesnt charge
(32:26 / Allied) I-AM-AMAZlNG: or help huskar
(32:27 / Allied) I-AM-AMAZlNG: 29:50
(32:39 / Allied) I-AM-AMAZlNG: damn
(32:43 / Allied) I-AM-AMAZlNG: coulda had them if bara helped
(37:53 / Allied) I-AM-AMAZlNG: 35:15
(37:56 / Allied) I-AM-AMAZlNG: bara just sits and farms
(38:01 / Allied) I-AM-AMAZlNG: refuses to help
(38:28 / All) Noob_Stalker: suck my dick
(38:32 / All) Noob_Stalker: you wouldnt yes orange
(38:37 / All) I-AM-AMAZlNG: orange was trying
(38:39 / All) I-AM-AMAZlNG: check replay
(38:54 / All) Noob_Stalker: youre just mad youre gonna loose
(55:13 / All) Noob_Stalker: haha bet you im not
(55:20 / All) Noob_Stalker: cry more noob bitch
(55:24 / All) Noob_Stalker: you suck dick
(55:28 / Allied) I-AM-AMAZlNG: Flaming and refusing to kick
Any further thoughts: I played with the guy before he game ruins a lot. please ban him for a long time.
This is an example of another 1 of his game. 50 mins 0-4-2 https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10130644
and ban the slark for 3 days please because i warned him to kick multiple times and i played with him before hes very toxic. He also VK abused on Rhasta, who is a new player. Rhasta was trying his best and used net on us, and his ult to push. so he didnt deserve to be vk abused. so slark did flaming, refusing to kick ruiner, and vk abuse
[DOTA] Game ruiner. ban slark for not kicking.
Moderator: ENT Staff
[DOTA] Game ruiner. ban slark for not kicking.
- Attachments
-
- 10130768.w3g
- (531.65 KiB) Downloaded 19 times
Last edited by matdas on Tue Jan 02, 2018 1:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: attached replay
Reason: attached replay
Re: [DOTA] Game ruiner. ban slark for not kicking.
Need immediate perma ban on : i(-i-)i
just saw him again and he game ruined wasted 50 mins did absolutely nothing all game https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10130644 just look at the stats at end of game it's not hard to see.....
just saw him again and he game ruined wasted 50 mins did absolutely nothing all game https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10130644 just look at the stats at end of game it's not hard to see.....
Re: [DOTA] Game ruiner. ban slark for not kicking.
I have had this displeasure with playing with I(I-I-)I, however this doesnt take much review to understand this ban request. He is clearly a noob
ELO (rank):
658.97 (31575)
Games:
107
W/L:
36/71 (33.64%)
Kills:
119
Assists:
352
Deaths:
473
KDR:
0.3:1
That being said, he doesnt ruin intentionally, nor did he when I played with him, he just isent up to par for 99% of players that see him. Simply sding him as shown above will illustrate the kind of player you will be interacting with. The people submitting BRQs should recognize this by now.
just my opinion
-now
ELO (rank):
658.97 (31575)
Games:
107
W/L:
36/71 (33.64%)
Kills:
119
Assists:
352
Deaths:
473
KDR:
0.3:1
That being said, he doesnt ruin intentionally, nor did he when I played with him, he just isent up to par for 99% of players that see him. Simply sding him as shown above will illustrate the kind of player you will be interacting with. The people submitting BRQs should recognize this by now.
just my opinion
-now
Re: [DOTA] Game ruiner. ban slark for not kicking.
Wrong. Watch the replay of the original post. Refused to help, take advice, and clearly game ruined on purpose. Stop posting on my ban requests, I don't know you. Find something better to do with your time.
- DotAKiasS]MzZ
- Resource Storage
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 11:47 am
Re: [DOTA] Game ruiner. ban slark for not kicking.
Calm down guys, move-away from drama which is not necessary in this case. I'd hope that mod will find a proper solution. This seems like a two kids in kinder-garten are twirtling with a tinies-ball.
Regards,
Regards,
- These users thanked the author DotAKiasS]MzZ for the post:
- Godrik (Mon Dec 18, 2017 9:19 pm)
-
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:07 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 154 times
Re: [DOTA] Game ruiner. ban slark for not kicking.
(10:25 / All) I-AM-AMAZlNG: ok vk abuse
(10:26 / All) I-AM-AMAZlNG: ur all banned
(14:40 / Allied) I-AM-AMAZlNG: lol brown
(14:47 / Allied) I-AM-AMAZlNG: ur parents create a idiot
(15:35 / All) I-AM-AMAZlNG: Kick brown and we kick oj
(16:46 / All) Loafstar: A votekick against player [i(-i-)i] has been started by player [I-AM-AMAZlNG].
votekick is abusive. Bara has done nothing that qualifies for game ruining at this point.
Not watching any further. You are rude and obnoxious, and then wonder why your allies are reluctant to do as you ask. Your statement ur all banned qualifies as admin impersonation, and you have been warned for this. Your initial votekick is abusive and you have been warned for this as well.
Denied.
(10:26 / All) I-AM-AMAZlNG: ur all banned
(14:40 / Allied) I-AM-AMAZlNG: lol brown
(14:47 / Allied) I-AM-AMAZlNG: ur parents create a idiot
(15:35 / All) I-AM-AMAZlNG: Kick brown and we kick oj
(16:46 / All) Loafstar: A votekick against player [i(-i-)i] has been started by player [I-AM-AMAZlNG].
votekick is abusive. Bara has done nothing that qualifies for game ruining at this point.
Not watching any further. You are rude and obnoxious, and then wonder why your allies are reluctant to do as you ask. Your statement ur all banned qualifies as admin impersonation, and you have been warned for this. Your initial votekick is abusive and you have been warned for this as well.
Denied.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 91 guests