[DOTA] GucciSwag@useast - Item Killing/Game Ruine

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

User avatar
pearson
Armored Tree
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:38 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 3 times

[DOTA] GucciSwag@useast - Item Killing/Game Ruine

Postby pearson » Mon Mar 26, 2018 5:15 am

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 560449.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #10
Your Warcraft III Username: Ryuzaki
Violator's Warcraft III Username: GucciSwag@useast
Violated Rule(s): Item killing
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 2:15 -> 2:45 of the replay time (not dota time)
Any further thoughts: It is somewhat complicated as the item wasn't broken, but the attempt to game ruine and item kill is 100% there, the item was attacked once, and there were several attempts to attack it twice and third time. This should definitley be counted as Game Ruine, maybe not so major as no harm was done, but the intention and violation exists.
" Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power. " -Abraham Lincoln

nitromon
Treant
Posts: 486
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 2:32 pm
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Re: [DOTA] GucciSwag@useast - Item Killing/Game Ruine

Postby nitromon » Mon Mar 26, 2018 9:17 am

Why do you think it is him?

(03:21 / Allied) Ryuzaki: who was rying to kill boots?
(03:36 / Allied) Ryuzaki: whoever was doing that
(03:38 / Allied) Ryuzaki: go appeal your ban
(03:39 / Allied) Ryuzaki: after game
(03:55 / Allied) Ryuzaki: someone was trying to kill items
(03:56 / Allied) Ryuzaki: of ally

You clearly have no idea. Weren't you accusing dg in the game?

(17:42 / Allied) Ryuzaki: ull be banned rylai
(17:48 / Allied) Ryuzaki: for trying to kill boots

I tried to scan the log for more conversation of why you would accuse him but it is just 35 mins of your flaming your whole team.

User avatar
pearson
Armored Tree
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:38 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: [DOTA] GucciSwag@useast - Item Killing/Game Ruine

Postby pearson » Mon Mar 26, 2018 10:04 am

nitromon wrote:Why do you think it is him?

(03:21 / Allied) Ryuzaki: who was rying to kill boots?
(03:36 / Allied) Ryuzaki: whoever was doing that
(03:38 / Allied) Ryuzaki: go appeal your ban
(03:39 / Allied) Ryuzaki: after game
(03:55 / Allied) Ryuzaki: someone was trying to kill items
(03:56 / Allied) Ryuzaki: of ally

You clearly have no idea. Weren't you accusing dg in the game?

(17:42 / Allied) Ryuzaki: ull be banned rylai
(17:48 / Allied) Ryuzaki: for trying to kill boots

I tried to scan the log for more conversation of why you would accuse him but it is just 35 mins of your flaming your whole team.


Don't try to boost your posts without watching replay first, reading chatlog is not enough, obviously. I understand you are hoping to be a mod one day in the future, but its very important to watch replay before judging games. I thought that was common sense? Apparently not to you.

When you view the replay, you'll see that pudge wasn't moving while the leaver hero was attacking the item. To further confirm that it was him using the leaver, you can put the control on him and see there is a green circle on the leaver, which means he was the one who was using the leaver.

As you are supposed to know, you can't see who is controlling a leaver until you watch the replay. I hope I clarified, and in the future please watch replays before judging. As a user who joined this forum since 2014, I assume that would be the very obvious thing to do

@nitromon
Attachments
pudge atk.png
pudge atk.png (1.31 MiB) Viewed 469 times
" Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power. " -Abraham Lincoln

BeerLord
Protector of Nature
Posts: 6658
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:07 pm
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 154 times

Re: [DOTA] GucciSwag@useast - Item Killing/Game Ruine

Postby BeerLord » Wed Mar 28, 2018 12:31 am

Wacking at the boot once is not ban-worthy.
Denied.


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 137 guests