[LTD] iamLEGEND

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

blazeitup
Forest Walker
Posts: 231
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2017 5:08 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

[LTD] iamLEGEND

Postby blazeitup » Thu Aug 30, 2018 4:35 pm

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11294002
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega #41
Your Warcraft III Username: faQQot
Violator's Warcraft III Username: iamLEGEND
Violated Rule(s): Do not lie about rules. (1200+ rule only 120 value)
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): from 26:46 and forward
Any further thoughts:

(26:46 / Allied) iamLEGEND: u realise anything over 120 value delay is bannable right?
(27:02 / Allied) iamLEGEND: ill prove it
(27:25 / Allied) iamLEGEND: its not lying
(27:30 / Allied) iamLEGEND: its an actual rule
(28:35 / Allied) iamLEGEND: NO u go read them
(29:07 / Allied) iamLEGEND: lmao keep threating ban
(29:10 / Allied) iamLEGEND: when im right

I tell him it's only a ltd 1200+ rule, he refuse to listen and tell me to go read the rules etc. He also sais he's going to report pink like 5 times, and orange 2 times through out the game. It's so important that we all obey the "1200+ pros" because they are not mega scrub like us, here's a perfect example of a n00b that refused to read mega rules before playing.

legiontdgrrr
ENT Staff
Posts: 835
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:58 pm
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: [LTD] iamLEGEND

Postby legiontdgrrr » Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:04 pm

player iamLEGEND there is not such a rule on mega, you can add delay more then 120 ,idk if you were joking or not but you threaten them you make brq and they banned or so , you lie about rules (since there is not such a rule on mega)

player iamLEGEND shoud be BANNED for lie about rules

Code: Select all

(26:46 / Allied) iamLEGEND: u realise anything over 120 value delay is bannable right?
(26:46 / Allied) iamLEGEND: u realise anything over 120 value delay is bannable right?
(27:11 / Allied) iamLEGEND: ill report oj after game
(27:25 / Allied) iamLEGEND: its not lying
(27:30 / Allied) iamLEGEND: its an actual rule
(28:20 / Allied) iamLEGEND: im not putting than 120 in the corners dude
(28:35 / Allied) iamLEGEND: NO u go read them(28:45 / Allied) iamLEGEND: and when u realise im right(29:07 / Allied) iamLEGEND: lmao keep threating ban
(29:10 / Allied) iamLEGEND: when im right


Do not deceive players about rules in an attempt to get them banned/to force them to do something they are not obligated to. For example, telling users to draw or they would get banned is deceiving as drawing is a mere vote and not mandatory.
seBastian Kimi is FASTER then you

devaztate
Armored Tree
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2018 5:15 pm

Re: [LTD] iamLEGEND

Postby devaztate » Thu Aug 30, 2018 9:33 pm

I dont really see the issue here, after watching the replay the persons delay was more than adequate and didnt in anyway change the outcome of the game, The only time the merge missed any gold or units was lvl 12, and to be fair thats not exactly iamlegends fault, hydra turret just didnt have the value to kill 12 fast enough. I also noticed that they spammed regen on king then threatened the guy when he did some hp/att ups lvl 7. They call king 10 then threaten him for doing just that. Not to mention they TK themselves by not doing any king on 10, which iamlegend even pointed out was a bonehead move. The entire team was toxic from the start of the game and they were obviously on a witchhunt for green.

blazeitup
Forest Walker
Posts: 231
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2017 5:08 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: [LTD] iamLEGEND

Postby blazeitup » Thu Aug 30, 2018 10:18 pm

Where exactly was I on a witch hunt for this play player other then when he started lying about the rules? What pink and oh said to him is not my concern. I'm not accusing him of tk here, only for lieing about the rules which he did.

devaztate
Armored Tree
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2018 5:15 pm

Re: [LTD] iamLEGEND

Postby devaztate » Thu Aug 30, 2018 10:59 pm

You also at one point in the game pretended to be an admin and said and i quote, "im going to ban you after this game" You should prob be thankful the player hasnt did a brq on you

legiontdgrrr
ENT Staff
Posts: 835
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:58 pm
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: [LTD] iamLEGEND

Postby legiontdgrrr » Fri Aug 31, 2018 12:27 am

guys this report wasnt about if he play bad or not , if he teamkill or not , it was about hes lies :) you never know how other players react when some1 says rules that doesnt exist on mega
seBastian Kimi is FASTER then you

blazeitup
Forest Walker
Posts: 231
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2017 5:08 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: [LTD] iamLEGEND

Postby blazeitup » Fri Aug 31, 2018 3:06 am

devaztate wrote:You also at one point in the game pretended to be an admin and said and i quote, "im going to ban you after this game" You should prob be thankful the player hasnt did a brq on you


That's exactly what I'm trying to achieve with this thread. I did never at any point pretend or say that I was an admin. And I was not flaming or going at green before he lied about rules in this game.

Dont try to turn the brq into something that it is not just to save your friend from a ban. He can take the ban, appeal and get familiar with mega rules.

devaztate
Armored Tree
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2018 5:15 pm

Re: [LTD] iamLEGEND

Postby devaztate » Fri Aug 31, 2018 3:51 am

blazeitup wrote:
devaztate wrote:You also at one point in the game pretended to be an admin and said and i quote, "im going to ban you after this game" You should prob be thankful the player hasnt did a brq on you


That's exactly what I'm trying to achieve with this thread. I did never at any point pretend or say that I was an admin. And I was not flaming or going at green before he lied about rules in this game.

Dont try to turn the brq into something that it is not just to save your friend from a ban. He can take the ban, appeal and get familiar with mega rules.


How does you saying your going to ban him not translate into pretending you hold a power on ent, since we're picking a choosing every little thing thats said as literal fact.........Maybe you should be more careful with your words......And yes it was a witchhunt, anyone can simply read the chat log and see that you and your obvious friends you Qd with was looking for any reason to brq this player

User avatar
Panopticon
Treant Protector
Posts: 851
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 3:03 am
Has thanked: 347 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Re: [LTD] iamLEGEND

Postby Panopticon » Fri Aug 31, 2018 5:53 am

@blazeitup

The only reason that devaztate is claiming it to be a witchhunt, is it's because he is iamLEGEND, and is trying to play it off that he isn't.

Also, saying that you're going to ban them is borderline admin impersonation when you're referring to making a ban request.

@devaztate The 120 delay rule is only applicable to 1200+ games, not standard Mega games.
PSA: Bigtits = Iambackk

tinker_666 = ta-ta

blazeitup
Forest Walker
Posts: 231
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2017 5:08 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: [LTD] iamLEGEND

Postby blazeitup » Fri Aug 31, 2018 4:44 pm

It's pretty obvious from how he tells me to go read the rules and that I dont know the rules etc that he never interpret what I said as I was a moderator. And that was also never my intent either. Just as you said, I was referring to making a ban request.

And I think you are right about devaztate = iamLEGEND.

devaztate
Armored Tree
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2018 5:15 pm

Re: [LTD] iamLEGEND

Postby devaztate » Fri Aug 31, 2018 6:18 pm

So according to you, only logical thinking and interpretation matters when its something u say...........Basically you were looking for a reason to brq this player and no im not iamLEGEND......the fact remains after seeing the replay your salty u and your friends lost the game and are looking for someone to blame it on. When in fact pink by far was the main reason u lost, i mean the fucking guy did 2 rr's before lvl 3 and iamLEGENDS delay never played an actual factor in the games outcome. where pinks tk actually did. Theres a reason noone respects the clan u represent, your toxic and unskilled when it comes to actual high level LTD gameplay

blazeitup
Forest Walker
Posts: 231
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2017 5:08 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: [LTD] iamLEGEND

Postby blazeitup » Fri Aug 31, 2018 6:25 pm

If someone wants to make a thread reporting me or someone else for tk they are free to do so. This is a report about lying about rules and nothing else, and I said that I would report him before we lost. I was even pretty sure we'd win at 15 and still said I would report him so why are you saying I was looking for a reason brq him because we lost?

devaztate
Armored Tree
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2018 5:15 pm

Re: [LTD] iamLEGEND

Postby devaztate » Fri Aug 31, 2018 7:09 pm

Cause thats what weak mega starz like yourself do, u cry and complain about stuff thats nonexistent to the game, your entire team was obviously aware that the "mega rules" allow more than 120 delay so why exactly are u reporting it other than to ease your weak mind?

Zio
Aura Tree
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 1:52 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: [LTD] iamLEGEND

Postby Zio » Fri Aug 31, 2018 7:27 pm

The way i see it blazeitup should be banned.
Do not deceive players about rules in an attempt to get them banned/to force them to do something they are not obligated to. For example, telling users to draw or they would get banned is deceiving as drawing is a mere vote and not mandatory.
also admin impersonation.
Also Blazeitup should learn that the +1200 mega rules are applied to the +1200 games, not to the +1200 players.

blazeitup
Forest Walker
Posts: 231
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2017 5:08 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: [LTD] iamLEGEND

Postby blazeitup » Fri Aug 31, 2018 7:53 pm

@Zio what? by blazeitup, i just assume you mean iamLEGEND?


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 63 guests