Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11692054
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #7
Your Warcraft III Username: bratmi
Violator's Warcraft III Username:
(selling towers): 18..
(refusing to votekick): cross.or.not, realchicken, emi1, haliluya812, pintuna, wezygoopie
Violated Rule(s): Do not teamkill (ex. blocking, maliciously using spells, destroying/hiding/stealing/massing items, selling towers, etc).
You are obligated to !votekick any player that has broken any of ENT's game ruining rules. If someone or several indicate that a particular player is game ruining, you, as a player in the game, are obligated to question/check about the situation/claim.
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): Level 6
Any further thoughts: Just before level 6, I advised 18.. to sell his infantry and upgrade his ygg, as it was very probable we receive a send. He upgraded his infantry to zeus, then sold the zeus, then build it again. It is not my fault if he doesn't know when he is allowed to sell for full gold or not. Immediately after that I requested a votekick explaining the reason, but noone agreed. Not only were we behind 105 in val for no reason, but we received a send and lost a heal on 6.
Edit: Apparently, yellow tried to protect pink by stating he did nothing wrong. Thus, he confused the opposite team. I wasn't aware of that because he ignored me when I started the votekick. Still, as the rules state, players are obliged to check about my claim.
[LTD] 18.. + multiple violators
Moderator: ENT Staff
Re: [LTD] 18.. + multiple violators
If watch whole replay. His team deny any problems caused by 18 and said that it's orange that's starting trouble no reason.
choosing not to vk is because there was no clear evidence that 18.. sold his infantry since his team did not support his claim or votekick either.
therefore a warning is not justified as
1) no evidence or support from his teamates that 18 commited any rulebreak
2) if i were to vk without any backup evidence would cause me to vk abuse if nothing was actually commited (and the vk went through)
choosing not to vk is because there was no clear evidence that 18.. sold his infantry since his team did not support his claim or votekick either.
therefore a warning is not justified as
1) no evidence or support from his teamates that 18 commited any rulebreak
2) if i were to vk without any backup evidence would cause me to vk abuse if nothing was actually commited (and the vk went through)
-
- ENT Staff
- Posts: 835
- Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:58 pm
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: [LTD] 18.. + multiple violators
denied
ok first since you saw you are weak 6 ,maybe you coud just hadys and not lod there but lets go on the game now
there is like no way he did that on porpose , imo he wanted just too get third ygg,but y what he did was bad, he coud sell tht inf before he up too zeus
but fails happen
now for the rest of the players you report , ok how you wanna some1 too kick him when no1 on your team says nothing
i think the team und that he just faild
ok first since you saw you are weak 6 ,maybe you coud just hadys and not lod there but lets go on the game now
there is like no way he did that on porpose , imo he wanted just too get third ygg,but y what he did was bad, he coud sell tht inf before he up too zeus
but fails happen
now for the rest of the players you report , ok how you wanna some1 too kick him when no1 on your team says nothing
i think the team und that he just faild
seBastian Kimi is FASTER then you
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests