shadowpriest, netghost18, plebmaster and surge4win

[HunterDK]

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/replay.php?id=11737036
Game Name: [ENT] HELLHALT TD #6
Your Warcraft III Username: hunterdk
Violator's Warcraft III Username: shadowpriest, netghost18, plebmaster and surge4win
Violated Rule(s): shadowpriest, netghost18, plebmaster -> refusing votekick, before 10 start when surge4win tk when he rage 10-15 sec before, when we dont send there, he just wanted us to lose, and opponent refuses to votekick him
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 20.19
Any further thoughts: none

[BlisteR]

Hi,
Since I'm involved on that game, I must say this.
First of all, hunterdk, is always flaming teammates and being rude with everyone.
Second, on that game he wanted to votekick surge4win, right before the lvl 10 started. As you can see, we already decided to send there, and rage. If we votekicked him at that stage, it would have beem a 3 send agaisnt 2 players, so way harder for them to handle.
Finally and most important, what was the point of kicking surge4win since they lost the game on that round, no matter what. ? I just dont get it. If that game continued and we refused to kick him, yeah sure he could ban request us, still that wasnt the case.
This is some wierd logic right here.

[halo_mauler]

The votekick was started seconds before the game ended.
surge4win banned 3 days