[LTD] hitsugaya[pol]

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

Manners
Aura Tree
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2018 8:35 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

[LTD] hitsugaya[pol]

Postby Manners » Mon Aug 05, 2019 1:56 pm

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 776508.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #38
Your Warcraft III Username: Noble.Plebeian
Violator's Warcraft III Username: hitsugaya[pol]
Violated Rule(s): Do not intentionally split to stall time, except to send double-demon.
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): wave 16
Any further thoughts: He splited his units and we was not even close to get a dd, just to stall time .

Hitsugaya[PoL]
Armored Tree
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: [LTD] hitsugaya[pol]

Postby Hitsugaya[PoL] » Mon Aug 05, 2019 2:24 pm

wow really ^^
yes we didnt send dd on 17 couse all send locks/krakens instead save for dd ( income wasnt needed since other team failed lvl 15 send, and at lvl 16 all had over 3k wood with 7/6 and 7/7 push so dd 17 was surely easy to reach for all), and i had a bit over 1300 wood at end round couse i calculated wrong and thought i rly get vvxz , instead that i had to infernal lock. wont mention with or without leak they were like 50 creep to short to survive, which leak didnt even affect game effect.

administration lose own time to consider all those request and its shame to that they need to lose time on requests like that.
regards :)

Manners
Aura Tree
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2018 8:35 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: [LTD] hitsugaya[pol]

Postby Manners » Mon Aug 05, 2019 3:02 pm

Did you mention you split? for us to do dd? i just went thought the logs and i didnt see any call for dd 17, so you just did it to stall time and its unfair for the enemy team even tho they prolly die to 3k send

Hitsugaya[PoL]
Armored Tree
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: [LTD] hitsugaya[pol]

Postby Hitsugaya[PoL] » Mon Aug 05, 2019 3:08 pm

yes i didnt call for dd 17 but we call to 17, and if dd possible i dont see any reason to call it, are you 10 year old that i need to tell you what you should send on send lvl ? or new in this game ? to me its normal if dd is possible (when you got 4k wood at 17) than you send it. i misscalculated wood and was a bit short to dd at end, everyone on team see i leak so no idea why do not send better send if you can. Oyu even wrote team wasnt close to send dd, if over 4k wood each send isnt enough to aim dd send than i dont know how big wood you need to aim it. as i told it didnt even affect game, let admin decide, i dont feel like i broke any rule.

Manners
Aura Tree
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2018 8:35 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: [LTD] hitsugaya[pol]

Postby Manners » Mon Aug 05, 2019 3:49 pm

well mods can see the replay and decide.
if i recall correctly wood was just over 3k if not less. be a man take the ban. <3 ( or warning )

epicdeath
Treant
Posts: 298
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:25 pm
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: [LTD] hitsugaya[pol]

Postby epicdeath » Mon Aug 05, 2019 11:10 pm

I think the rule is worded badly. Why should it be okay to split for double demon but not okay to split for an extra kraken each. Imo as long as someone splits on the level before their send in order to get a bigger send it should be allowed under the spirit of this rule. If you ban for this I think you have to ban everyone who splits with the intention of reaching DD but is unable to.

Viserion
Forest Walker
Posts: 133
Joined: Fri May 08, 2015 10:58 am
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: [LTD] hitsugaya[pol]

Postby Viserion » Mon Aug 05, 2019 11:23 pm

Iam really looking forward to see what u decide here because this happens very often but the rule clearly says its forbidden but i see even admins calling people to split for more time when dd never was an option.. So, normally it should be a ban but since the rule is not respected by mostlikely anybody iam curious what u decide. This will be a precident here and depending on your decision i know better if splitting for just time and not dd is ok or not :)

User avatar
Krocis
Treant
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2014 10:21 am
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: [LTD] hitsugaya[pol]

Postby Krocis » Mon Aug 05, 2019 11:55 pm

this is the worst interpretation of rule rly, does it rly matter if u wanna send dd or tripple krak or whatsoever? :D this shud be denied instantly and rule shud be re-wrote
Image

oceano
Armored Tree
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2016 2:41 pm
Has thanked: 3 times

Re: [LTD] hitsugaya[pol]

Postby oceano » Tue Aug 06, 2019 1:04 am

Krocis wrote:this is the worst interpretation of rule rly, does it rly matter if u wanna send dd or tripple krak or whatsoever? :D this shud be denied instantly and rule shud be re-wrote

As Krocis said, this is by far the most retarded rule for LegionTD ever made by mankind.

cranky
Forest Walker
Posts: 118
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 9:28 pm

Re: [LTD] hitsugaya[pol]

Postby cranky » Tue Aug 06, 2019 7:10 am

biggest joke report ever :D , ofc you can split when you are sending next lvl to get maximum you dont have to send dd.. id understand the report if he splited and wouldnt to get more time

Manners
Aura Tree
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2018 8:35 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: [LTD] hitsugaya[pol]

Postby Manners » Tue Aug 06, 2019 9:18 am

Having a rule fix or change is way better than an unfair ban 100% i got nothing on hitsugaya. let the mods decide or maybe FIX THE RULES* <3

legiontdgrrr
ENT Staff
Posts: 835
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:58 pm
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: [LTD] hitsugaya[pol]

Postby legiontdgrrr » Sun Aug 11, 2019 4:44 am

will give just wanring(since on the rules , u can split for dd only)
and we see what we do about that rule
kinda agree with all here ,if u split too send , why shoud be not for more krakens or just a bigger send
seBastian Kimi is FASTER then you


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests