[CW] spoiler+

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

magicbox
Armored Tree
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:27 am
Been thanked: 1 time

[CW] spoiler+

Postby magicbox » Wed Oct 26, 2016 11:36 am

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/replay.php?id=8522078
Game Name: [ENT] Civilization Wars #43
Your Warcraft III Username: liialabaco
Violators' Warcraft III Usernames and Rules:
dynamicjun@asia - spoiler
unteee@asia, sizeb@asia, haran@asia - refusal to kick spoiler
Time of Violation (in-game or replay):
Any further thoughts: first assent was at 14:23 (after he lost towers and almost all docks)

RaptorXI
Treant
Posts: 363
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 5:43 pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: [CW] spoiler+

Postby RaptorXI » Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:41 pm

He called for your help several times so you should keep this ban reason for your IH imo. ;)

User avatar
aRt)Y
Protector of Nature
Posts: 13142
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 174 times
Contact:

Re: [CW] spoiler+

Postby aRt)Y » Tue Dec 06, 2016 4:51 pm

@magicbox I dont get what this ban request is about.

Please specify the rule violation so they align with ENT's wiki rules.
    Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
      Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition

RaptorXI
Treant
Posts: 363
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 5:43 pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: [CW] spoiler+

Postby RaptorXI » Fri Dec 09, 2016 8:43 pm


User avatar
aRt)Y
Protector of Nature
Posts: 13142
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 174 times
Contact:

Re: [CW] spoiler+

Postby aRt)Y » Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:51 pm

@magicbox As you did not comply with my request, the ban request is denied.

The link above is kinda useless for me as the context is still missing.
    Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
      Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 146 guests