Page 1 of 1
JacksenTan uswest.battle.net
Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 12:51 pm
by veroken247
Replay Link:
http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 133707.w3gYour Warcraft III Username: verroken
Violator's Warcraft III Username: JacksenTan uswest.battle.net
Violated Rule(s): Maphacking
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 15:00
Any further thoughts: This is my first time filing a ban request, please feel free to contract me on any further requirements you might need.
Re: JacksenTan uswest.battle.net
Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 1:18 pm
by Quentin
Hello,
I watched the replay and indeed he killed you while you were invi around 15 min replay time (not game time), but he had ultied u and you were low hp, and you were likely to go this way to the fountain (you went straight to it actually...). So I think that it is only a weak evidence.
Furthermore, he bought at least 6 wards in the 15 first min of the game, which is useless if he really mh.
So I will deny this request for me, and wait for another review.
Re: JacksenTan uswest.battle.net
Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:13 pm
by Triptronic
he had vision, and like DiED said he wouldnt waste his gold on the wards if he was maphacking. This isnt proof but he definitely had vision imo.
Re: JacksenTan uswest.battle.net
Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:54 pm
by CountChocula96
The fact he bought wards doesn't mean anything, because MHers usually buy wards to cover their mh (some of them aren't dumb to just use mh that obviously). JacksenTan does have a lot of suspicious moves, I've played with him before. But yea, this brq should be rejected due to lack of evidence. Just wanted mods to keep informed of this user for the future. I think this is the 3rd mh request out for him I saw.
Re: JacksenTan uswest.battle.net
Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 4:29 pm
by Quetra
Just because it is possible for mhers to attempt to hide their tracks by doing things that are 'non suspicious' like buying wards doesn't mean that any such evidence should be automatically discounted as hiding their tracks. It can still be an indication that they are not mhing, just not conclusive if there are enough other suspicious moves.
Re: JacksenTan uswest.battle.net
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 11:35 pm
by FalenGa
Map hack requests based on suspicious movements take plenty more than 1 particular incident. In this case, the aforementioned incident was not even suspicious.
You may repost this request once you've collected further evidence of map hack, and presented them to us.
Processing.